EXONERATE CO2

Not too many people in America know about L.E.D. Lights. How can this be when Led Lights offer so many features like; 1) a 90 % reduction of lighting electric load; 2) an exceptionally Long Life typically in the 50,000 hour range; 3) Additional savings of electricity because of a reduced Air-Conditioning Load; 4) Smooth, flicker free light that promotes a pleasant feeling; 5) Sturdy construction and touch-safe surface temperatures. With features like that it is no wonder that there is a “LED Lighting Revolution in progress. It appears that some good old fashioned, Capitalism and a heck of a lot of risk-taking enterprisers have stepped forward to do the job. An internet search on “LED Lights” found over 25 million contacts!.

America's Electric Power Generation Capacity is about One Million Mega Watts and if the capacity taken up by lighting our homes and businesses is about 30% of the total, a quick estimate is that 300,000 Mega Watts is devoted to lighting. If only 30,000 Mega Watts is needed by LED Lights, we get a HUGE 300,000 Mega Watt Capacity freed up to do other things. There has never been such a big energy savings that the LEDs can provide.

The Leds will also drive down the air conditioning load because the old lights put out so much heat.

Many of the internet findings were for automobile, boating, flashlights and other uses that do not provide a reduction in the national installed capacity. They are beneficial and save money and should be done. But the uses that make installed capacity available for other things is a basic conservation effort and conservation is often dull like adding insulation to buildings.

Therefore the fastest way to get the most savings is to think about manufacturing the fewest number of Led Light designs that can be determined as “The Minimum Standard LED Lights” so as to reduce the basic price due to a higher production volume. The internet searches indicate that a LED substitute for a 60 Watt incandescent bulb is a reasonable starting point. A Led Light will only consume 6 or 7 Watts using the new Technology.

Also, by the way, My wonderful wife picked a website off of a talk radio broadcast last recently and it got me off the subject of exonerating CO2 and puts it on to the back our illustrious politicians to fix the harm that they have done.

I learned that “Water Vapor” does 95% of the job (not my 80% guess). I don’t have to change it because I added the above link. Scroll down to the list of Green House Gases and the title “Do you see something missing? This man ( James A. Peden, Editor of the piece ) has done a good job and everybody is requested to press his Donate Button and send some cash. So, in addition to the 800 page statements in CO2science.org sent to the EPA, the above link and all the other links that exonerateco2 has provided:

CO2 HAS INDEED BEEN EXONERATED and I can go forward selling the LED Lights that will free the electric utilities that their customers need to install to lower consumption so low as to make the Piddling 10% that the nukes provide (not their 20% lies) is an exercise in futility. We all have to wait to see if our Government Folks kill the GNEP, which stands for Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, an invention of the Bush Administration.. Contact rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com

So, what this means is that this Author can spend full time promoting LED Lights and help America to go forward with the most important lighting technology ever discovered. The basics have been in use for 30 years and only recently have the enterprisers all over world decided to apply their skills to the Led Lighting Revolution.

A thorough internet search and evaluation has resulted in deciding that www.earthled.com is a really good starting point for anybody who wants to get involved in the Revolution at any level. This author is greatly relieved that CO2 has been exonerated and he can therefore move forward with helping America to get busy. More details about EarthLed Products (with part numbers) are shown below starting at Page 2, below

The last of the "ExonerateCO2" stuff before moving forward with additional LED Light choices.

It was fun to prepare the above information during the present period of political and economic doom and gloom caused by the great (CO2 is Pollution) forces who promote falsehoods for the purpose of financial gain or, while performing harmful activity against the environment like all the production and release of horrific atomic solid radio-active waste that will be on our planet forever or who destroy our wonderful fresh water supply. The release of over 100,000 Curies per year of Radio-Active Tritiated Water per year into our air and mixed into our rivers is fraud at the highest level when the people who do it claim to provide safe, clean power. Tritiated Water can not be recognized by people as being different from pure water but it is there and they are drinking it.

Economic and Political harm is being caused by the “Carbon Footprint” promoters who want to tax our economy for personal gain while promoting lies about the wonderful Carbon Dioxide that is Innocent! We must free ourselves from the CO2 Lies and The Atomic Waste producers. The first step is to install a house full of L.E.D. Lights and buy some clothes line and clothes pins. Always ask the typical “Global Warming” believer “What is the Principal Green House Gas?” Then, tell them to go to www.exonerateco2.com and send a donation to the P.O. Box listed there. r.j.g. 9/29/09

Remember : CO2 + Water + Sunshine = Life and both the CO2 and the Water are under Attack!

The use of sunshine to make power or save energy has always been fought by the same people.

If CO2 is innocent of being the cause of Global Warming (even if it got cold lately} and Tritiated Water at 60,000 Pico Curies per Liter is allowed to be released from the Atomic Power Plants by the EPA, and is very harmful, how come nobody is doing anything about it?

Here is what Robert F. Kennedy Jr, President of the RiverKeepers Alliance, who the Pittsburgh Post Gazette reports, 9/22/09, that he came here (to the area of R.J.Gramm for the G20 Meeting) and said “Coal can not be clean” or whatever the exact words were. The coal fired electric utilities have been cleaning, scrubbing and stopping fly ash and acid rain for over 50 years and making real progress at the cost of many billions of U S Dollars and this guy comes to town and contributes to the myth that CO2 is pollution. At the same time there were many of his 200, and more, “river keepers” out in the rivers in their Kayaks being exposed to Tritiated Water (and drinking it at home wherever they are in America) because the EPA approves of releasing more than 100,000 Curies per Year from the 104 operating Atomic Reactors that release it into essentially ALL of our watersheds.

It just feels like Al Gore sent him to re-enforce the Cap and Trade (Carbon Credit) stuff world wide because there is no Democrat who does not believe in “Global Warming” and that “CO2 is Pollution” when our Congress says it is and when the new EPA administrator says that the proof is “Un-deniable”. There was no high profile voice to point out to the Post Gazette (The local Liberal Paper) the 5 points listed on Page 1-A. There is NO PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE to speak of that mentions how bad the Tritiated Water is and that there were no environmental impact studies made and no epidemiological data to support the releases 30 years before the DNA code was understood. The DOE and the EPA both point to the 1958 Atomic Energy Act and we are still stuck with it. We need an Act of Congress.

Having said all that, the obvious thing to do was to INVITE riverkeepers.org and their many supporters and participants to jump into the fight and get some results that need to be done now. The real issue is AMERICA FIRST, fixing problems is 2^nd and politics is last.

In the case of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as your president, He needs to study www.exonerateco2.com and come to the conclusion that "CO2 is INNOCENT" and there is plenty of proof to prove it, like the German Essay, 150 pages, and the Peden Op Ed.

In the case of the Tritiated water releases he needs to read the 2 Hoffman Essays (links near the bottom of this thread) and study the plan of R. J. Gramm as presented in his web site.

Then, he will be able to help FREE all Americans from lies, deceit and Carbon Credits

Hello: The North Carolina Water Science Center personnel are likely to be drinking Radio-Active Tritiated Water from the many nuclear power plants that release the radio-active water into your drinking water. Help is on the way. And, you can help yourself as well. The EPA (see Page 20) and DOE are of no help to you.

As you can see from the thread below, I have discovered the wonderful USGS and the project I am working upon has broad and far reaching consequences. The attached file sets the stage. I hope you will open it and read it carefully.

In particular, because North Carolina has 10 Nuclear Reactors surrounding Charlotte and Columbia, the first project is to install enough L.E.D. Lights ( call it step 1 ) to permit step 2, shutting down those reactors and convert them to non-radio-active fuel sources like natural gas, bio-fuels and clean coal. Step 2 is not an easy task because it takes about 5 years after being shut down for the recently made highly lethal radio-activity to reduce their activity to the point where people could actually work upon the steam pipes leading to the electric generators that have value and produce the electricity. But, the idea is to have reduced the power enough because of the low power consumption of the LED Lights so you don't need the power from the Nukes anyway. Duke Power wants to build a new nuke in your area and there is no public out cry? Why is that?

The first part of the project is easy because buying the LED Lights by the electric customers pays for the lights during the first year because of their reduced power bills. Then the reduction stays in place for as long as the lights are working (about 10 years). It is a great help for the people in the Carolinas, yourself included.

Please ask everybody in the office (and those folks in the Charlotte office who drink bad water starting from Lake Norman) to open my web site www.exonerateco2.com and scroll down to Page 2-0, Page 2-U, Page 8 and 8-A and Page 23-A and B which lists all the Carolina newspaper editors and publishers (that I could get the e-mail addresses from the web) and who I mailed to several times.

I am wondering if you agree with the 4 Points that are listed in the attached file "Page 1-A Truth to Help America.doc" which I am also pasting into this mail to make it easy for you to read without having to open Microsoft Word?

These 4 points outline basic facts that can not be denied by anyone. Because of that, the page is worthy to be sent to all members of congress for legislative action after a period of research as to the accuracy of the facts. Is it easy for you to see if 'cong_liason@usgs.gov' and 'twest@usgs.gov' as well as 'suzette_kimball@usgs.gov' ,the acting administrator, actually read my important page which has been posted on www.exonerateco2.com ?

Or, is incoming e-mail simply treated as spam that does not have to be acted upon like my response to the EPA mail as shown in the web site?
OK, so what if the EPA can ignore what my response to them was ignored. They have an anti-co2 bias and are attached to DOE who are stuck with Nuclear Power.

You, on the other hand, are FREE to look at my words, check up on the facts and call Suzette and ask if she saw my stuff. Similarly, you can call Mr. West and see if he has the power to forward my stuff to Congress. What the heck does the Liaison Office do anyway?

I did a search on your web site under "Tritiated Water" and I got 59 complicated hits. It looks like you folks drill a lot of holes to see where ground water is going and use Tritiated Water as a flow tag. You use scintillation counters to do it and what you should be doing is using the same equipment to test all the contaminated drinking water on the surface as well in the interest of advising congress (and the EPA ) how severe the situation is. I would never go swimming at New Orleans at the mouth of Ole Miss for sure. I would never drink the water down there. And, I would never recommend that anyone should use the Gulf as a pristine body of water. About 12% of the Gulf is replaced by Tritiated Water loaded with untold amounts of raw sewage and toxic chemicals that the EPA has lost control of. Did you know about all the Tritiated Water? Ronald

Here are the words that can change America for the better: A second posting:

America is a wonderful place to live because of Truth, Justice and the American (Energy Consuming) Way of life. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is possible in America because we have always shared our wealth and given the lives of millions of our citizens to protect our safety and provide freedom to the rest of the world as well.

Remember : CO2 + Water + Sunshine = Life and both the CO2 and the Water are under Attack!

The use of sunshine to make power or save energy has always been fought by the same people.

So, Doctor Spooner, I will post this page on my web site and wait for a response from the USGS. My web site is 100% transparent and all objectives (and the underlying agenda) are shown at all times.

RE: Point 1 ) Death to “Global Warming ala Al Gore”----- NASA was the first clue about Water Vapor being the principal Green House Gas and then the chart on Page 27-A (and also on Page 40 of the exonerate section) as well as the Peden Op Ed and with reference to Gerhard Gerlich’s work as on Page 28-C of the exonerateCO2 section. One can compare the resume’s of Peden and Gerlich and easily conclude that the resume of the great CO2 Myth Promoter is Nothing in comparison and unworthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.

RE: Point 2 ) is an expose of the Nuclear Power Industry that is currently releasing over 100,000 Curies of Radio-Active,Tritiated Water that easily totals 1.5 Million Curies over the last 30 years into essentially ALL of our our fresh water lakes and rivers without the knowledge by the General Public and the Congress at large. Many of those “in the know from the past” are already dead and the younger people drink the water without knowledge about how to protect themselves.

RE: Point 3 ) is a short summary of how our wonderful CO2 works to feed all life on Planet earth and all the people in Congress should ask the scientific community to add to what is presented and restore the status of CO2 to it’s former respect and level of appreciation.

RE: Point 4 ) is an expansion of Point 1 that explains how Water Vapor provides the global warming we all need to survive by the use of clouds and the automatic control of the Solar input that continuously arrives on our rotating globe to distribute the energy and keep us warm and alive with food and the many bounties of our wonderful water world.

The following pages describe how the DOE and EPA e-mail recipients and the USGS folks were informed about what to do with this situation in an exercise of transparency totally unlike the Presidents “Ravages Of Climate Change” which was an embarrassment to America, our scientists and our educational system.

Page 1-E Transparency for the DOE and EPA mail recipients who do not treat my mail as spam

From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:03 PM
To: 'teller.lawrence@epa.gov'; 'r5hotline@epa.gov'; 'r7actionline@epa.gov'; 'Smith.Roxanne@epa.gov'; 'Leavy.Jacqueline@epamail.epa.gov'; 'Daloia.James@epamail.epa.gov'; 'Rotola.Joe@epamail.epa.gov'; 'Cadeau.Letitia@epamail.epa.gov'; 'Freeman.Martin@epamail.epa.gov'; 'DeMatteis.Marion@epamail.epa.gov'; 'Malleck.John@epamail.epa.gov'; 'Debonis.Michael@epamail.epa.gov'; 'epa-seattle@epa.gov'; 'R2_Web_Inquiry@epamail.epa.gov'
Subject: Asking 14 EPA Folks to respond to the 4 points of TRUTH

Your response is important because the vote on CRAP and TRADE could be influenced.

From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:44 PM
To: 'anna.palmisano@science.doe.gov'; 'kathy.holmes@science.doe.gov'; 'mike.riches@science.doe.gov'; 'david.thomassen@science.doe.gov'; 'wanda.ferrell@science.doe.gov'; 'leslie.runion@science.doe.gov'; 'karen.carlson@science.doe.gov'; 'kim.laing@science.doe.gov'; 'kiran.alapaty@science.doe.gov'; 'jeff.amthor@science.doe.gov'; 'todd.anderson@science.doe.gov'; 'anjuli.bamzai@science.doe.gov'; 'paul.bayer@science.doe.gov'; 'roger.dahlman@science.doe.gov'; 'michael.kuperberg@science.doe.gov'; 'david.lesmes@science.doe.gov'; 'rick.petty@science.doe.gov'; 'bob.vallario@science.doe.gov'; 'ashley.williamson@science.doe.gov'; 'sharlene.weatherwax@science.doe.gov'; 'joanne.corcoran@science.doe.gov'; 'dean.cole@science.doe.gov'; 'daniel.drell@science.doe.gov'; 'joseph.graber@science.doe.gov'; 'susan.gregurick@science.doe.gov'; 'roland.hirsch@science.doe.gov'; 'john.houghton@science.doe.gov'; 'arthur.katz@science.doe.gov'; 'peter.kirchner@science.doe.gov'; 'noelle.metting@science.doe.gov'; 'prem.srivastava@science.doe.gov'; 'marvin.stodolsky@science.doe.gov'; 'michael.teresinski@science.doe.gov'; 'elizabeth.white@science.doe.gov'
Subject: In Advance of USGS response I am asking U-All what you think?

I had the strength to quit a nuke situation on the day I got my degree in Physics and my life immediately got better. How about you?

From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:31 PM
To: 'Ask-A-Geologist@usgs.gov'
Subject: Dr. Spooner passed the buck to you on my 4 truths to help America

So, therefore I am sending the entire communication thread to you for your assistance. The basic problem is POLITICAL in nature which explains why nobody has an answer so, here it all is to you.

Getting help from nameless and faceless people has not worked so far on this project. Your response will end up on my web site.

I hope this time I will find someone with the ability to get into the project and call Suzette and Mr Wade (as I asked Jeff) and see what can be done. If you can find a mistake (other than criticizing the EPA and DOE ) please tell me what it is. My web site www.exonerateco2.com also has important references like the Peden Op ED, the Hoffman Essays and Gerhard Gerlich Summary on Page 28 C in the ExonerateCO2 section which follows the LED Light section.

The reply from Dr. Spooner was:
Mr. Gramm,
I'm sorry, but this is beyond my area of expertise. I am not a hydrologist or geochemist, and I have no formal training in atmospheric science. For a more informed response to your four points you should contact Ask A Geologist through their web site: http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/ask-a-geologist/
Hopefully, they will be more helpful than I can be.

Jeff
_______________________
Jeffrey Spooner, Ph.D.
U.S. Geological Survey
1400 Independence Road 1F
Rolla, Missouri 65401

e-mail: jspooner@usgs.gov
voice: 573-308-3526
fax: 573-308-3794
geog: N37 57 14 W91 44 42

Doctor Spooner, Sir :
Thanks for your help.
I am wondering if you agree with the 4 Points that are listed in the attached file "Page 1-A Truth to Help America.doc" which I am also pasting into this mail to make it easy for you to read without having to open Microsoft Word?
These 4 points outline basic facts that can not be denied by anyone. Because of that, the page is worthy to be sent to all members of congress for legislative action after a period of research as to the accuracy of the facts. Is it easy for you to see if 'cong_liason@usgs.gov' and 'twest@usgs.gov' as well as 'suzette_kimball@usgs.gov' ,the acting administrator, actually read my important page which has been posted on www.exonerateco2.com ?

Or, is incoming e-mail simply treated as spam that does not have to be acted upon like my response to the EPA mail as shown in the web site?
OK, so what if the EPA can ignore what my response to them was ignored. They have an anti-co2 bias and are attached to DOE who are stuck with Nuclear Power.
You, on the other hand, are FREE to look at my words, check up on the facts and call Suzette and ask if she saw my stuff. Similarly, you can call Mr. West and see if he has the power to forward my stuff to Congress. What the heck does the Liaison Office do anyway?
I did a search on your web site under "Tritiated Water" and I got 59 complicated hits. It looks like you folks drill a lot of holes to see where ground water is going and use Tritiated Water as a flow tag. You use scintillation counters to do it and what you should be doing is using the same equipment to test all the contaminated drinking water on the surface as well in the interest of advising congress (and the EPA ) how severe the situation is. I would never go swimming at New Orleans at the mouth of Ole Miss for sure. I would never drink the water down there. And, I would never recommend that anyone should use the Gulf as a pristine body of water. About 12% of the Gulf is replaced by Tritiated Water loaded with untold amounts of raw sewage and toxic chemicals that the EPA has lost control of. Did you know about all the Tritiated Water? See the live links to the Hoffman Essays near the bottom of this group of mail.

Here are the words that can change America for the better:

Page 1-A Truth to Help America

1) The Principal Green House Gas is Water Vapor which accounts for 95% of the global warming that keeps us warm against the cold vacuum of outer space. Almost 18 Trillion Tons of Water Vapor and water suspended in the atmosphere provide a self regulating system of temperature control that automatically produces layers of clouds to keep us warm at night or keeps us cool during a hot day in many places as needed. In addition, the water in the atmosphere rains down on us and provides our valuable fresh water for drinking, crop irrigation with a system of distribution using the many fresh water lakes and rivers.
2) The Atomic Power Industry has always contaminated the precious water vapor and many rivers and lakes with Radio-Active Tritiated Water that is produced when making hot water that makes the steam to drive the electric generators. The releases, into the air in the neighborhoods and into the nearby rivers and lakes, are approved by the EPA using old Atomic Bomb type rules that do not apply to Tritiated Water which inevitably becomes part of the human body and can cause a multitude of harmful health problems. The human Genome, which has recently been delineated many years after the EPA rules were established, can be harmed by the radiation inside the cells of the body itself.

1G
3) Carbon Dioxide is the ONE and ONLY food growing, environmental gas upon which all life on Planet

Earth depends with the assistance of Water and Sunshine and the process of Photosynthesis. CO2 is a heavy gas that falls toward the ground level and the oceans and is put to use by the Green Plants and green life in the oceans as well. It is absorbed by the vast surface of the oceans which automatically controls the atmospheric CO2 level at about .035% above the ocean surface in a state of equilibrium. Life forms produce at least 60 billion tons of CO2 per year during the life cycles of all the people and animals and during the process of decay after death and biodegradation on the Forrest floors and in the fields.
4) Only about 700 billion tons of CO2 exists in the atmosphere and it is always under pressure to supply the growing green plants, forests and oceans. CO2 is a weak Green House gas when compared with water vapor because of the poor spectral absorption of incoming and out going radiation when compared with water vapor and, because the water vapor forms clouds automatically to prevent heat loss at night and also limit incoming solar radiation when required during the day.
America is a wonderful place to live because of Truth, Justice and the American (Energy Consuming) Way of life. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is possible in America because we have always shared our wealth and given the lives of millions of our citizens to protect our safety and provide freedom to the rest of the world as well.
It was fun to prepare the above information during the present period of political and economic doom and gloom caused by the great (CO2 is Pollution) forces who promote falsehoods for the purpose of financial gain or, while performing harmful activity against the environment like all the production and release of horrific atomic solid radio-active waste that will be on our planet forever or who destroy our wonderful fresh water supply. The release of over 100,000 Curies per year of Radio-Active Tritiated Water per year into our air and mixed into our rivers is fraud at the highest level when the people who do it claim to provide safe, clean power. Tritiated Water can not be recognized by people as being different from pure water but it is there and they are drinking it.
Economic and Political harm is being caused by the “Carbon Footprint” promoters who want to tax our economy for personal gain while promoting lies about the wonderful Carbon Dioxide that is Innocent! We must free ourselves from the CO2 Lies and The Atomic Waste producers. The first step is to install a house full of L.E.D. Lights and buy some clothes line and clothes pins. Always ask the typical “Global Warming” believer “What is the Principal Green House Gas?” Then, tell them to go to www.exonerateco2.com and send a donation to the P.O. Box listed there. r.j.g. 9/29/09
Remember : CO2 + Water + Sunshine = Life and both the CO2 and the Water are under Attack!
The use of sunshine to make power or save energy has always been fought by the same people.

So, Doctor Spooner, I will post this page on my web site and wait for a response from the USGS. My web site is 100% transparent and all objectives (and the underlying agenda) are shown at all times.
Sincerely,
Ronald J. Gramm 412- 364-7402 r.j.g. 10/06/09

From: Jeffrey D Spooner [mailto:jspooner@usgs.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:54 AM
To: ronald gramm
Subject: Re: FW: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water
Mr. Gramm,
The USGS does not maintain the specific information that you asked about (the location of nuclear power plants, and intake facilities for municipal water use along the Mississippi). I did a quick search of the web using the key words "nuclear power plants map" and hit this site:
http://www.insc.anl.gov/pwrmaps/map/united_states.html
It should provide you with the general locations of nuclear power plants within the Mississippi River drainage basin that are upstream of the metropolitan St. Louis area. As far as the locations of municipal drinking water intake facilities along the Mississippi, you will probably need to contact specific communities along the river to determine if they use water from the Mississippi, or from some alternative source. You might also want to contact the brewery in St. Louis to determine how they treat the water that they use, and the St. Louis

Metropolitan Sewer District to determine how they treat effluent. I hope this helps.     Jeff
Jeffrey Spooner, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey   1400 Independence Road Rolla, Missouri 65401
e-mail: jspooner@usgs.gov   voice: 573-308-3526   fax: 573-308-3794    geog: N37 57 14 W91 44 42
Jeffrey, Sir:
You are sitting in the middle of the Ole Miss watershed and I am on a quest to find out if the effluents of Tritiated Water from the nuclear plants go right downstream and into the drinking water company intakes. For example I worry that the breweries at St. Louis are pulling water out of the river and using it to make radio-active beer that goes nationwide. I worry about the millions of people along Ole Miss drinking the bad water as well.
How can I find maps that will show exactly where the nuke plants are and where drinking water is taken out?
Advise.      Ronald
From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:59 AM
To: 'twest@usgs.gov'
Subject: FW: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water
Maybe it is within your power to help?
Ronald
From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:54 AM
To: 'suzette_kimball@usgs.gov'
Subject: FW: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water
Hi!
I am looking for some help in advising congress to act upon the subject of Tritiated Water Releases.
Will you help?
Thanks, in advance.
I know you are busy.
Ronald www.exonerateco2.com

From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:47 AM
To: 'cong_liason@usgs.gov'
Cc: 'crobrien@usgs.gov'
Subject: FW: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water
I am using the e-mail address on your web site.
It didn't work the first time.
Hope it works this time.
Ronald

From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:41 PM
To: 'cong_liason@usgs.gov'
Cc: 'crobrien@usgs.gov'
Subject: FW: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water

Hello:
A citizen in Pittsburgh PA needs your help to contact all the House representatives and Senators to report that a very bad situation has been uncovered over the last 5 years about what is going on with essentially all of our drinking Water.                                            1I
It is being contaminated by Radio-Active Tritiated Water on a continuous basis since the first reactor at Shipping Port PA and ever since as new (now old and dangerous) plants were brought into service. The 104 reactors now making solid waste are also releasing in excess of 100,000 Curies per year of Tritiated Water into most of our rivers and large lakes that supply our drinking water.
Please go to www.exonerateco2.com and advise what more I can do to assist you to contact all the people in our congress (and the President as well) to do something about this terrible situation. The EPA is no help at all because the administrator is a CO2 hater and a nuclear power proponent. The attached file is a starting summary about what this citizen discovered and is also posted today on the web site. The DOE is equally to blame as well and never forthcoming with the truth on CO2 or Tritiated Water.
More information is also below in this mail. And because my the web site is very hard to read, I hope that these few pages will spark some interest in behalf of all of our citizens who are at risk because of all the shenanigans going on.
Advise what I need to do and what you can do to help. Ronald
From: ronald gramm [mailto:rongramm@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 4:55 PM
To: 'Cheryl R O'Brien'
Subject: RE: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water
Cheryl:
Holy Smokes!
water.usgs.gov IS EXACTLY what I need to save America and all of us here in America (who drink water) appreciate your suggestion and what Water.USGS is all about.
Ronald
From: Cheryl R O'Brien [mailto:crobrien@usgs.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:51 AM
To: ronald gramm
Subject: Re: FW: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water

Mr. Gramm, there really isn't anything else I can do. I suggested that you contact the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -- they really are the corrrect agency to contact.

We do have USGS Water Science Centers in every state. I'm not sure what else they may suggest, but you can find contact information at http://water.usgs.gov .

Cheryl   Cheryl O'Brien U.S. Geological Survey 507 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr. Reston, VA 20192

Cheryl:
Thanks for trying to help. The link that you sent gave me the e-mail address that I copied in above to receive a copy of this mail. I can not take the time to fill out forms because there is usually no record of what was sent and no promise of any reply.
The EPA has a history of ignoring any communication for which they have no answer and they have "Pat " answers for everything but Tritiated water.
In the case of Tritiated Water they use "Tritium" as the subject to discuss and say it decays to Helium and emits low level

radiation. They never discuss the potential harm of Tritiated Water which permits the human body to accept it as ordinary pure water and then the Tritiated Water can become part of any soft tissue that needs water on a continuous basis and does not "Pass through" the body in 2 days. The 20 some odd EPA people on my mailing list have never responded to me. That's OK.
The following 2 links explain what one good guy has to say about the situation, Ace Hoffman. I have included the e-mail to Ace because he cares what the EPA thinks about his work. They have never acknowledged that they received it or that they were going to do something. For that reason, Ace allows anybody to make a copy of his work for the good of the public: EPA always passes the buck back to DOE and the 1958 Atomic Energy Act when put under pressure for any Nuclear question.
I hope you will tell everybody in your office and neighborhood to go to my web site www.exonerateco2.com as well as sending the following 2 links to the powers to be; The new EPA administrator is a CO2 expert that likes DOE and Nuclear Power. God bless her.
http://www.animatedsoftware.com/environment/tritium/2007/ItsAllAboutTheDNA.htm

These links are on page 129 0f the exonerateco2 part of this site and I asked 9 EPA folks to send the links to the administrator, who has since been replaced.
Nothing happens when I contact the EPA and that is the way it is. Page 136 shown the Ole Miss problem.
There is a fear that the effluent from the Nuclear Plants goes directly into the intakes of the water plants downstream at high concentrations of Tritiated Water.
USGS can surely locate the intakes for the water suppliers and the Nuke release points.
What should I do?
Ronald

.From: Cheryl R O'Brien [mailto:crobrien@usgs.gov] On Behalf Of ASK USGS
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:38 PM
To: ronald gramm
Cc: GS-N Archive_Ask
Subject: Re: Massive releases of 100,000 Curies per year of radio-active Tritiated Water into all our drinking water
Dear Mr. Gramm,
Water quality is more an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issue. This appears to be their contact information page for monitoring and assessing water quality:
http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/contact.html

Hope this helps.
Cheryl O'Brien
USGS
crobrien@usgs.gov
(703) 648-5929

Hello:
I have a high regard for what you do, but this is one you are likely to have missed. The EPA and DOE are not very smart or transparent.
Is there anything that you can do to stop all the Tritiated Water releases from the Nuclear Power Plants into all of our drinking water sources?
Please go to
www.exonerateco2.com and advise if you can find any mistakes.
Advise if you have any suggestions about what you find.
Advise if you can provide financial support if you like what I am doing.
I do not have much hope in getting any response because to get one would be a problem for the responder.
Heavy politics and conflicts with other agencies are involved.
The kind of help I am seeking would be to exactly locate the water source inputs for the water companies that serve all of the large cities and towns located along the Mississippi River Basin and see if the intakes are too close downstream to the release points from the Nuclear Plants.
Thanks for all help that you can provide, in advance. Ronald J. Gramm End Page 1-J

1 ) The Principal Green House Gas is Water Vapor which accounts for 95% of the global warming that keeps us warm against the cold vacuum of outer space. Almost 18 Trillion Tons of Water Vapor and water suspended in the atmosphere provide a self regulating system of temperature control that automatically produces layers of clouds to keep us warm at night or keeps us cool during a hot day in many places as needed. In addition, the water in the atmosphere rains down on us and provides our valuable fresh water for drinking, crop irrigation with a system of distribution using the many fresh water lakes and rivers. NASA was the first clue about Water Vapor being the principal Green House Gas and then the chart on Page 27-A (and also on Page 40 of the exonerate section) as well as the Peden Op Ed and with reference to Gerhard Gerlich’s work as on Page 28-C of the exonerateCO2 section. One can compare the resume’s of Peden and Gerlich and easily conclude that the resume of the great CO2 Myth Promoter is Nothing in comparison. The CO2 Myth is unworthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.

2) The Atomic Power Industry has always contaminated the precious water vapor and many rivers and lakes with Radio-Active Tritiated Water that is produced when making hot water that makes the steam to drive the electric generators. The releases, into the air in the neighborhoods and into the nearby rivers and lakes, are approved by the EPA using old Atomic Bomb type rules that do not apply to Tritiated Water which inevitably becomes part of the human body and can cause a multitude of harmful health problems. The human Genome, which has recently been delineated many years after the EPA rules were established, can be harmed by the radiation inside the cells of the body itself. This is an expose of the Nuclear Power Industry that is currently releasing over 100,000 Curies of Radio-Active, Tritiated Water per year that easily totals 1.5 Million Curies over the last 30 years into essentially ALL of our fresh water lakes and rivers without the knowledge by the General Public and the Congress at large. Many of those “in the know from the past” are already dead and the younger people drink the water without knowledge about it and how to protect themselves.

3) Carbon Dioxide is the ONE and ONLY food growing, environmental gas upon which all life on Planet Earth depends with the assistance of Water and Sunshine and the process of Photosynthesis. CO2 is a heavy gas that falls toward the ground level and the oceans and is put to use by the Green Plants and green life in the oceans as well. It is absorbed by the vast surface of the oceans which automatically controls the atmospheric CO2 level at about .035% above the ocean surface in a state of equilibrium. Life forms produce at least 60 billion tons of CO2 per year during the life cycles of all the people and animals and during the process of decay after death and biodegradation on the Forrest floors and in the fields. This is a short summary of how our wonderful CO2 works to feed all life on Planet earth. All the people in Congress should ask the scientific community to add to what is presented here and restore the status of CO2 to it’s former respect and level of appreciation.

4) Only about 700 billion tons of CO2 exists in the atmosphere and it is always under pressure to supply the growing green plants, forests and oceans. CO2 is a weak Green House gas when compared with water vapor because of the poor spectral absorption of incoming and out going radiation when compared with water vapor and, because the water vapor forms clouds automatically to prevent heat loss at night and also limit incoming solar radiation when required during the day. This is an expansion of Point 1 that explains how Water Vapor provides the global warming we all need to survive by the use of clouds and the automatic control of the Solar input that continuously arrives on our rotating globe to distribute the energy and keep us warm and alive with food and the many bounties of our wonderful water world.

America is a wonderful place to live because of Truth, Justice and the American (Energy Consuming) Way of life. There is much going on that needs both truth and justice, these days.

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is possible in America because we have always shared our knowledge, our wealth and we have given the lives of millions of our citizens to protect our safety and provide freedom to the rest of the world as well. Life and Liberty are under attack, these days.

Remember : CO2 + Water + Sunshine = Life and both the CO2 and the Water are under Attack!

The use of sunshine to make power or save energy has always been fought by the same people.

The link http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/qw is one heck of a spectacular display of how important water is to all of us because we need to drink it to live.

and it appears that not one of them cares about or is concerned with the incessant and insidious releases of Radio-Active Tritiated Water which can and will become part of some cells in your body.

Having 380,777 sites that avoid the measurement of Tritiated Water makes one wonder how that can be?

The EPA has the standard that says the Atomic Plants must dilute the Tritiated Water with fresh water to get the concentration down low enough to release. After it is released they are done with it.

That makes the EPA (and DOE, and the HRC, and the President) happy to get rid of it.

The Water companies who pull in the contaminated water and distribute it to the unsuspecting customers are Innocent.

The USGS has enough trouble to keep track of the many sites they have and no one has ever asked them to measure it as an obligation in the interests of the public health because the EPA says that Tritium releases weak radiation. They only set the standard for the work of the Nuclear Plants who want to get rid of a problem. Letting it evaporate into the neighborhood (and let it rain down somewhere else) is also a good way of getting it off of the property as they learned after the Three Mile Island Meltdown

Since USGS is strictly a scientific research organization, not regulatory nor policy-making, there appears to be no hope for something to be done. However, over the years, SOMEBODY has suggested or legislated and funded them to do what they do. They are a part of the Department of the interior and it is a funny arrangement that the Director is chosen by the congress instead of being appointed by the Department of the Interior?

Therefore some time will be sent asking around why that un-familiar somebody can not direct them to get busy and ask all the questions of the scientific and medical community to come forth with some hard data about what the heck is going on. Looking at DOI.gov revealed that the mission of DOI is:

The U.S. Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nations natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated Island Communities

Therefore, the proposed suggestion for the acting Director of the USGS, Dr. Suzette Kimball to state to the Congress that: “ I can no longer let all the Radio-Active Tritiated Water continue to be released into virtually ALL of our watersheds without proper study and analysis of the degree and extent of the harm that those releases may be causing . There is suspicion that the health of the DNA that Americans are made of can be harmed by such a material as Tritiated Water that becomes part of any of our individual body cells ”.

Therefore, this author begs Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar to recommend and support the continued activities of Suzette as the Director of USGS and empower her to establish the necessary program to protect the nations fresh water from Radio-Active contamination of any kind and most specifically that of Tritiated Water which behaves like pure water but then radiates and then destroys from within. r.j.g. 09/09/09

Many of the US agencies have things to do about our fresh water. For example using it to irrigate crops so we can live is very important to the USDA and the farmers that grow the crops. Irrigating the crops with Radio-Active Tritiated Water results in crops with built-in Radio Activity which the body will accept as pristine food made with pure water and when the unsuspecting citizen consumes the food some of it will become part of the body and some of it will become radio-active body parts that will decay into free HO radicals and a useless gas that the body doesn’t know what to do with. And, the speedy electron shot out of the radio Active molecule when it harmlessly decays (like the EPA tells us) at 1/3 the speed of light it will cause a problem for near-by molecules when it gets slowed down enough to ionize something in the way. To save some time, this author keeps pasting the 2 links of environmentalist Ace Hoffman as follows:

The NWMC provides Direct assistance, information, and technology on water-related issues for natural resources conservation. And they deal with many things like “Efficiency, effectiveness and equity of policies directed toward improving agriculture's environmental performance”.

As one might expect, they have NO IDEA that they are helping to cause the use of Radio-Active water to be allowed to be used to irrigate crops because they “Look the other way” when the possibility of the EPA approved releases into most of our rivers and lakes is discussed.

This page was sent to Keith E. Admire, Director of the MWMC, keith.admire@ar.usda.gov and as usual to The secretary of Agriculture’s e-mail address and all my mailings were treated as spam. The Secretary does not want to get into a fight with the EPA and DOE. Or, a staffer always sends my stuff to the block spam list. Maybe the ecologist, david.heffington@ar.usda.gov can generate some interest in this?

Hopefully the 2 of the new names will open the above 2 Links from Ace and also visit www.exonerateco2.com to get the whole scoop and ask the Secretary to get involved and send the attached pages to the Congress asking for some legislative action.

This is the right time to send this stuff to the congress because the crap and trade content in the energy bill is a fake and a fraud and some people involved should be put in jail and such foolishness dispelled from our laws when CO2 is mentioned as “Pollution” and “ The National Tritiated Water Contamination of all our Fresh Water” is known.

All of this stuff has broad and far reaching consequences and the more people who know about it the better.

This Page as well as the previous 2 pages posted on the web site will be attached to an e-mail sent at the earliest opportunity.

Please open the attached file "Truth to Help America Expanded.doc" which is a basic "Truth Test".

It will be difficult for you to admit that Carbon Dioxide is a very minor player in the matter of "Global Warming".

You may actually believe that it is the cause of Global Warming backed by hard scientific data.

The attached file and my web site that backs up a 5 year project that I am engaged in without any support from anybody. I do this because I am "paying back America" for the wonderful and comfortable life I have lived because of the many freedoms that we have here and because of our wonderful energy consuming way of life. As a basic "Environmentalist" with 10 years in the solar heating equipment industry (2 Patents) that followed my 10 Years in the Medical Research and Development at Fisher Scientific Company (1 Patent on a calibrating system for a blood cell counter), I watched the way the Anti-CO2 story was built up over many years. At first it was laughable and later, totally un-acceptable.

I hope you will pass the above Word file to all members of your Prize Committee so that they may consider looking into all the information that I have collected and published on the web site as I found it and presented it starting with my biased scientific outlook and a 50 year career after the receipt of my Bachelor Degree in Physics in 1958.

As I usually do, I will post this letter and this request for you to "BACK OFF" our case and admit to the awaiting world that you have been mis-led by the IPCC and a host of British and American pseudo scientist co-leaders for the CO2 myth. I point to the British first because of what Karl Marx did to hurt the world as a typical example of the idea that "the road to hell is paved with good intentions". In the case of the IPCC and a cadre of followers in Europe that always try to hurt America, the idea that "Time Wounds All Heels" is applicable. In your case because of your cold climate and basic distance from the ravages of 2 world wars (where America contributed millions of dead soldiers to protect freedom) it is easy not to appreciate how wonderful it is for America to have suffered through the wars and then have left behind the freedom and stability that you enjoy. It is easy to be a liberal if you don't have 10 dead family members killed by tyranny. It is easy for you to be ashamed of the harm caused by people who used Dynamite for harm just as we are by the use of Atomic bombs to destroy the 2 cities in Japan.

Most of the Dynamite I know about was used to build the American infrastructure and the civilian uses around the world for dams, bridges, roads and water projects. The Nobel Peace Prize is a way for you to beat upon yourselves because of the bad things that others did with Nobel's work. Give him some credit for the good that he actually did. You owe it to him and his family.

I submit that James Peden and the Middlebury Op Ed that he has put together is a far better piece of work than the Gore item that he destroys. The Gore Prize was your statement of a Liberal view point and it may well be that your view will cause you to immediately delete this mail and forget about it.

Truth will always win. Even when it turned cold 5 years ago, the foolish Global Warming Myth continues under the name of "Climate Change". Even when we learn that Polar Bears like the Ice Pack and can swim hundreds of miles, the Global Warming Believers show them as victims of global warming when in fact they are not. Even when the ice gets thicker at the south pole because it is colder lately and that increase in thickness causes more ice to slide toward the ocean. The believers show the ice falling as a result of the non existent global warming.

The myth goes on and on including fudged ice core data and faulty Hawaiian data from the middle of the Ocean which is a world of its own. A Water World just like the Whole Water World that we live on.

I nave no idea how often you get negative letters like this that criticize you views, after all who IS R.J.Gramm and what gives him the right to call Global Warming a “Myth”? Americans are likely to believe in major media propaganda because we have a basic faith that nobody could make up a false story and get away with it. Our legislators and our Supreme court has called CO2 “Pollution”. That is harmful to America and was caused by a basic lack of knowledge about CO2 which is outlined in my 4 points and in my web site.

The vote on “Cap and Trade” is soon to happen and if such a horrible tax is placed upon America it will partly because you got behind “Global Warming” and it was done because of the freaky input of people with a pro-Nuclear Power agenda. We are wasting a lot of effort collecting data on “Carbon Emissions” and ”carbon footprints” as a result of your going down the garden path of fantasy. God bless the one and only gas that grows the food for all life on our water world.

I hope that this note is not insulting to you and harmful to the various alignments with other nations that have been built up over the years. You do impressive work and only a minor “Truth Adjustment” is necessary so you don’t violate the laws of nature in future projects. You can surely back track by showing pictures of our wonderful water paradise that keeps us warm and comfortable against the cold vacuum of outer space and a hostile universe. Most of my countrymen appreciate the recent award to our new and young President and we all hope that it will have a positive effect upon him as well as upon the rest of the world.

We have never seen a water covered planet with a system of self controlled global warming like the one we have, and maybe that is why we have gone so far afield as to believe that wimpy Carbon Dioxide causes global warming. It really is embarrassing for America to believe in such an erroneous thing and pass laws verifying it as truth. The 18 Trillion Tons of water and water vapor suspended in the atmosphere and backed up by so much water below in the oceans which produce it as a result of a continuous supply of sunshine really is the principal Green House Gas. It is so wonderful that it is hard to believe. Please go over my page and the web site carefully and let me know what you think.

The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system.

According to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation.

In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarified. By showing that:

(a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric green-house effects,

(b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet,

(c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 deg C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly,

(f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.

I must have done a bad job presenting the work of Gerhard Gerlich the first because a remote editor in the Smokey Mountains was not impressed with my descriptions:

Macon County, in the Smoky Mountains has a population of approx 25,000 with a lot of seniors (like Me) who will miss the opportunity to go to www.exonerateco2.com and find out how to save some money for many years by using LED Lights, all because of a guy with a big ego who totally misses the message about the Tritiated Water that surely is harmful.

He was the ONE and ONLY GLOBAL Climate Change believer that ever responded to my mail outs and it may well be that he fears the "Ravages" of Climate change that the President mentioned.

Please do not bother sending me any more misinformation, sir. I do not think it is wise to try to convince people that global climate change is not occurring. In fact, I think it is downright foolish.

So, now that I showed that I and Middlebury (Peden) are not the only ones that can see through the smoke, it may well be that being in the Smoky Mountains obscures what this single individual can see and not recognize the TRUTH when he sees it. So he was deleted from my list. r.j.g. 10/14/09

The EPA ruling that “Carbon Dioxide is a Dangerous Pollutant” that is a danger to the public health and safety is an unacceptable statement that must be retracted. Since we all breathe out tons of CO2 every year as part of our life, and that CO2 is the ONE and Only food growing gas upon which all life on Planet Earth depends, there is very little DANGER associated with it. It is NOT a danger to public health but in fact it is part and party to our health and our survival.

We let the stupid Congress declare it as pollution because there was insufficient interest to try to stop them. But now, saying it is DANGEROUS is an absolute and false use of the word that is contrary to a high school science course or contrary to our exact understanding of the 60 billion Tons of CO2 released into the atmosphere by all the life forms every year. Professional calculation of that amount might easily show it to be almost 10% of all the CO2 that exists in the atmosphere, say, 700 Billion Tons. It explains how difficult it is to arrive at a number for the percentage of CO2 in the Atmosphere. The best place to measure it is about 2 feet above the surface of the vast ocean surface and we should forget about the falsified 150 year old ice core measurements and the falsified Hockey Stick Chart.

The EPA administrator BELIEVES that the IPCC fraudulent data is “Indisputable Proof” of the existence of global warming caused by human activity even though it has been cold for the last 10 years. As of today, there are at least 1 BILLION PEOPLE who believe the same thing and it will be many years after the IPCC is discredited and dismantled before the belief dies out. The believers will fight hard and will be supported by the Cap and Trade advocates who have invested one heck of a lot of money after the legislative effort now being pushed through Congress.

That puts the EPA at the forefront of fear mongering that is even more potent than the Presidents “Ravages Of Climate Change” that he mentioned earlier this year. That Puts the EPA in the undesirable position of attacking the wonderful CO2 (that we all depend upon to live) as well as allowing the terrible contamination of all our fresh water (that we all need to drink) with Radio-Active Tritiated Water. That is an obscene thing for the “Environmental Protection Agency” to be doing. They are not Protecting the Environment but rather attacking the two most important things that life depends upon, CO2 and Water.

In the over all picture, the EPA is a great agency that really has a lot of toxic chemicals to fight and they really do a good job. The people who work there care about what they do. Only the upper management has swallowed the IPCC CO2 pill and the DOE Tritiated Water Standard.

They need to get with The USGS and The USDA and discover how the three of them can put water quality and safety at the top of their list and get some honest epidemiological studies and some environmental impact studies done on the Tritiated Water.

In the interest of fair play to the IPCC, the following e-mail was sent on 12/10/09 to the secretariat of the IPCC at the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in Switzerland and the reply is sure to be enlightening. r.j.g.

I have noted that NASA, in America, says that the Principal Greenhouse Gas is WATER VAPOR and I am wondering why you never mention it?

The IPCC.ch web site is very pretty. One would hope so what with all the UN funding that they get. from UNEP.

We allowed the UN and a bunch of people around the world (who just plain don’t like America) to take advantage of us with lies and deceit much the same way as the intelligence for the Weapons Of Mass Destruction in Iraq was fed to us from England 10 years ago.

Fortunately time wounds all heels and the IPCC is certain to unravel all the way to nothing. But, the harm in the minds of 1 Billion People will leave a lasting impression on then World for a long time. Oh, the Polar Bears are doing fine, by the way. They sure are good swimmers.

4^th ) The LEDs will last a very long time, Bill will stay Down for Over 10 years

(America needs about 100 Billion of Led Lights to reduce electric power by 30%)

* Finally, when all your neighbors, friends and relatives (and anybody else you send this page to) join the

Led Light Revolution, the Utility executives, Local politicians and Business leaders will get the message that if 22 million led lights are sold in the 10 mile area around a Nuclear Power Plant, the power usage will drop by 30% and they will have to conclude that it is time to convert the reactors to conventionally fired boilers. It stops the harm they are releasing into their customer neighborhoods.

EarthLed.com ( Design0Lux CL-3, 4-Pack --@---$ 100.00 ) see below, Page 2-A.

The first item from EarthLed ( Design0Lux CL-3, 4-Pack --@---$ 100.00 ) purchased in lots of 20 bulbs would reduce electric lighting capacity by 540 Watts, that is, 600 watts of incandescent lights replaced with 60 watts of LED Lights reduces the lighting capacity by 540 watts. In terms of the number of the 30 watt bulbs being replaced by 3 watt bulbs it comes out to be 300,000 divide 30 watt common bulbs being replaced = 300,000 million watts divide 30 watts = 10 billion of the 3 watt bulbs.

Who would have ever realized that a bunch of little solid state lights could reduces America’s Electric Power load by so much? When the air conditioning load is reduced (because 90 % of the incandescent lighting is heat added to the building that requires electric power to get rid of it) the savings are a Green Project. And, doing the project in states like the Carolinas gives them priority because both the lighting and air conditioning load is reduced and the Carolinas have a Nuclear Power Disease. There are too many Atomic Reactors in the Carolinas and they will become obsolete if everybody down there goes out and buys L.E.D. Lights on a high priority basis.

Thus, the last benefit is that all the Radio-Active Water released by the Atomic Reactors will be eliminated.

So, the good news for the folks in North and South Carolina is summarized as follows:

1 ) The LED LIGHT buyer will invest, say, $ 500.00 and get an electric bill reduction of at least $ 250.00 per year for 11 years = $ 2750.00 return on investment paid for by the reduced electric bills.

2) The lighting and air conditioning load in both states will also be reduced significantly to the point that the customers can request that the Nuclear Plants must reduce output to lower their Radio Active Waste accumulation rather than reducing coal and or natural gas consumption.

3) Many of the Reactors will be able to be converted to Coal and gas over the 5 year radio active cool down period before the conversion projects can start.

5) The solid fuel can then be sent to remote places instead of encircling Charlotte and Columbia as they now do.

So, THAT is what can be called a SUPER GREEN Project that is good for the environment in a lot of ways.

This author is asking all LED Light Manufacturers to send LED Light sales people to the Carolinas and start selling them as fast as humanly possible because peoples health, safety and economic condition is under attack by the horrible accumulation of atomic waste, the terrible releases of Tritiated Water, and the risks of cataclysmic failure of any one of the many reactors that could happen because they are old, brittle and in a continuous state of criticality at all times.

We cam use the fear mongering approach these days, like the government does all the time lately in the Bail-outs and the Health insurance situation.

This author is not saying that all LED Light Manufacturers should become Anti-Nuclear Power Advocates because none of those kind of folks never got the job done and have switched to other do-good activities to survive. I am saying simply to use the general idea as just another reason to buy LED Lights that will get people thinking about the future of a country with another 35 reactors on the planning agenda thanks to George Bush.

In the case of the folks in the Carolinas, it surely has health and survival implications and we are waiting to see what all the newspaper editors and publishers are going to do about it.

The more one looks into this, the more amazing it becomes. Here is some information From:

The Bulb under consideration is Item No. 2CW, 7.5 watts (60 Watt) 6 pieces or more @ $ 94.95 Each.

Holy smokes there is somebody out there who thinks like this author on a national and anti-nuclear basis.

Most of the Palo Verde Power goes to California so they over there can “think Green” when they mention how little the amount of nuclear power there is in the California while the send all of the bad water and air contamination to Phoenix which is downwind. The water in the foreground ( which appears to be the Phoenix City Sewage Treatment Plant, wherever that is ) gets most of the Tritiated Water dumped into it and that has to be looked into. It is a “Dirty Picture” and a national disgrace for sure. All that water vapor shown going up in the air is contaminated with Tritiated Water which will show up in the rain somewhere and get into peoples food and their bodies and become part of them.

If one were to multiply the 23,506,198,080 watts saved for each day and calculate how much the electric load from al the incandescent bulb heat it would be a shocker how good the project is.

If one multiplies the daily saving by 365 days per year the economic gain for America gets really interesting. And if that savings is multiplied by a 10 year life, the mental work invested by the ccrane folks really does have national implications.

Somebody needs to look at exactly how many bulbs have to be sold to southern Californians and Phoenix area folks to see if Palo Verde can be shut down as a result.

Curiously, all these manufacturers seem to miss the savings due to the reduction in air conditioning load as well as the long term tax free income that reducing electricity cost will provide. This price is good! This author temporarily posted this page to see if they like having this page on exonerateco2.com ?

The request for a long term arrangement for 48 pieces of SDB-019a (600 Lumens) or 48 Pieces of SDB-018-b (720 Lumens), 60 Watt replacement, to be sold as the only 2 packages for ”LED Light America” from this source has been made and the total price for each of the 2 packages will be posted as soon as it is available. R.J.G. 8/17/09

There appears to be a large number of ways to cool the chips to a very low temperature that assures a long life using only gravity convection of ambient room air.

Another search on “ L E D Lights “ produced 86 Million Results using Microsoft Bing.

There is not too much time in my lifetime available to take a look at all of them but, why not take a swat at finding some more prospects because the Stability of America is involved and LED Lights may be just the right medicine that America needs to protect the electric supply and get rid of the terrible Nukes that are contaminating all our drinking water and casting aspersions upon Carbon Dioxide to justify their existence. Hating lies and liars is a worthwhile activity. Carbon Credits are a result of gross violations of truth (a politically correct way of describing lies) and they must be made illegal ASAP.

40 Deg C is really COOL Price for 1 unit ---$59.95 contact : customerservice@ledwaves.com

There are a lot of choices and the catalog can be found on their web site www.ledlightdisplay.com

But this author has asked the folks there to suggest the best buy for a consumer who has $ 500.00m and wants to get the electric bill reduced as far as possible with 40 to 60 watt replacements and that kind of payment size.

This company is the proof that the U S Department of Energy has greatly mis-led America with the stupid Mercury contaminated CFLs and saddled the manufacturers with a large inventory of questionable “ Energy Star” products with a disposal problem. One of my contacts had this to say about the CFLs “Something else to consider about compact fluorescent is the failure rate within the first 600 hrs is 20% and the actual observed lifetimes are 2500 to 3500 hrs for the 80% that make it past the first 600 hrs. Advertised is 10,000 hours life which is not likely even in optimum conditions.”

DOE only admitted that LED lights exist in April 2009 while China has been working on it for at least 30 years. See Page 29 “Energy Star” finally gets with it.

............ Acriche is the world first semiconductor lighting source using AC current without convertor. Acriche is environmentally friendly however an incandescent electric lamp and a fluorescent lamp contains harmful material like mercury and lead. Acriche is a compound word with Acro meaning the top and Riche(Fr.) meaning the richness. It means SSC supports the better life through the world top class LED.

· General lighting Architectural lighting Street lighting Residential lighting (Under-cabinet)

. We have done a Good Job Helping South Korea since the war and we should now study what they have got done and carefully make partnerships that will use the best and most applicable ideas for our future.

Seoul Semiconductor, Inc has THOUSANDS of Patents in this field. E-MAILs for regions in the USA:

These products are revolutionary (as this author believes) and all the companies listed so far would benefit greatly by doing business with this company and save themselves a lot of work and costs.

Without worrying about the entire electric capacity for the USA and how much it can be reduced by LED Lights, one can go back and work on just the 14 Million people in the Carolinas and consider only household LED Lights. It may be so that 14 Million people live in 3.5 million households. For now, consider that a reasonable number of LEDs to be bought for the test project might be 20 of the 40 watt replacements. That is 20 of the 4 watt LEDs that reduce capacity by 36 watts for every bulb installed. Then, the number of chips involved is 20 x 3.5 = 70 Million for the test project costing about $1,000.00 per household for the best UL, dimmable, available now from EarthLed. They may be able to lower the price as the volume goes up and we can let the market determine that.

The Lowes Management hasn’t gotten the word yet that the life and the failure rate for the CFLs is not too good. Based on what I saw at the Pittsburgh Lowes in Cranberry Township (a 100 foot long rack about 7 feet high and 3 feet deep) they have a big problem and they will have to do something. This author will send by mail to Lowes Merchandising office, PO Box 1000, Mooresville NC 281117

ATTENTION: Merchandiser of CFLs and suggest that that person should contact Mark@earthled.com to see what can be worked out with a starter supply of the best 4 watt LED now available.

There are 111 Stores in NC and 45 Stores in SC and hopefully they are all not loaded with the CFLs like the Cranberry Store. Acriche can also contact Lowes and ask them how many of the 4 watt leds they might be willing to buy after seeing a demonstration and test result results program because of the life testing that Acriche has already done over the years and the work that Earth LED did to get their UL certificate. My good China connection with paul@eastridgeltd.com had the bad news for CFLs long before anybody over here and I have learned over the years that good businessmen make money by turning Liabilities into assets.

In this case the contact between Lowes and Mark at Earth Led and some contact with Mr. Eastridge may be able to bring to America the lowest price and best life and performance that the people in the Carolinas need and deserve. They certainly do not need CFLs and they deserve LEDs. In this case maybe even Acriche can jump into the story and do some price cutting to get the ball rolling in America as well.

I am asking tony.kinard@acriche.com to jump into the fray and ask if they too know about the CFL problems as well? The poor DOE has hurt the “Energy Star” brand with the bad performance of the CFL designers and testers and they should get with it and take a look at the Earth Led 4 watt.

The bad failure rate for the CFLs, my next store neighbor had 2 fail recently and he did not mention it to the store, is also bad news for the UL people because there are many millions of losers out there with a UL stamp on the base not living up to the info that allowed the buyers to believe and to buy.

Not to waste too much space on the CFLs, it is worth mentioning that each CFL is a bomb with 2 kind of fuses. The first 20% goes off in less than 800 hours the second one for the rest that do not have a short fuse are set for only 2000 hours. That is a long time for Lowes to wait to see what happens to a lot of valued customers because it could take a few years to materialize. The longer they wait before making a decision on the matter the bigger the problem gets if they keep them in the stores.

Therefore, the sooner the 3 above people can get to the Lowes management the better. My printer is not doing too well these days and it may take me a month or two to mail to the North Carolina merchandising manager. I e-mailed to the corporate management thru their contact page web site form but one never knows who is reading what was sent. Maybe Mark can call down there and get an appointment to get Lowes to find out which brand is failing and stop buying from that source while they ask some tough questions about certified life test data on the others.

A fourth guy in China is also included in the mail out sending this page because I have been in contact with him and he knows what is going on in the LED business.

His name is Steve, postmaster@stardust-lighting.com and it will do him good to know the previous 3 guys on this page. He has already helped the folks at www.ledlight.com re: Page 2-C , to be deleted.

The LED Light industry is relatively new in America ( thanks to the help from DOE) and the fact is that all LED folks are looking into a very large market and therefore, they are not really competitors but business people with an entirely different way of doing things and are not likely to loose sales to each other because of the huge size of the market in America. r.j.g. 8/24/09

We must switch to L.E. D. lighting as soon as possible and thereby eliminate 300,000 Megawatts of electric power capacity in America. If we look for a single design to do it, say a 40 watt replacement that only uses 4 watts of power, we need to install only 7.5 Billion of the Acriche chips suitably installed inside a bulb with an Edison screw base. Naysayers will say it is a naïve approach because we need some 100 watt bulbs, some 70 watt bulbs or some 60 watt bulbs.

OK, how about using 3 of the 40 watt replacements (12 watts) to do the job of the 100 watt looser? How about using 2 of the 40 watt replacements (8 watts) to do the job of the 70 watt incandescent? How about cheating with a 40 watt replacement (4 watts) instead of the 60 watt Antique? Use the 40 watt replacement (4 watts) instead of a 40 or 30 watt standard bulbs? Recently, I had dinner in a restaurant with table lamps having two 30 watt bulbs sitting side by side inside a shade that did a good job without making me squint because of brightness 3 feet from my face. A single 60 watt bulb would be bad there.

As one can see on the previous pages, there are a lot of smart people in the world who had the vision (and even the need) to develop led lights and it has left America as a follower rather than the leader. Our Department of Energy left us in the dark. They are too busy promoting carbon footprint legislation rather doing the one thing that will drastically reducing the need for electric capacity. They are too busy helping Toshiba qualify new nuclear power plants and getting big corporations with Mercury vapor CFLs into trouble. We do NOT have to save China from the ravages of Climate Change.

NOW, is the time to recoup the money we spent supporting 50,000 troops in South Korea for 50 years by suggesting to Seoul Semiconductor that a special project to drastically cut down the power capacity requirement in North and South Carolina as a test project to see exactly how low the electric power capacity can be reduced as quickly as possible. We can suggest they present a detailed, tested and complete 40 watt device with a pre-approved UL label that will automatically get instant UL approval if American manufacturers jump into the production and marketing of “Energy LED Star Bulbs for the Carolinas”. And, the shipping cost for foreign manufacturers who jump into the project to help the Carolinas will be supported by people who want this project to go forward step forward and say so.

Page 8 “South East Nukes” suggests that 105 Billion of the 4 Watt Acriche chips (40 watt replacement bulbs) installed by 3.5 million households can shut down 8 Reactors and return $ 52.5 Billion dollars in reduced Electric Utility Payments per year. A pipe dream if there ever was one. It is suggested that the Seoul Semiconductor folks take a look at what this author says about the Southeast market for LED Lights and see how fast they can make 70 Million Chips and set the price on that basis in addition to the cost to manufacturers and a fee to use their proprietary UL design. How much lower than $ 50.00 per bulb will the proprietary design cost? It makes no sense to wait for the Korean patents to run out. Surely, they know of the 36,000 American soldiers who died protecting them.

In that regard this page was e-mailed to tony.kinard@acriche.com who covers the south east and who can personally benefit by drinking much less Radio-Active Tritiated Water (which is in all the drinking water down there) and I will benefit knowing that my daughters family in Charlotte are a little bit safer as well. There will be plenty of work for the 8,000 reactor workers in the 8 reactors shut down who should be assigned to assemble the bulbs instead of sitting around in next to a dangerous antique reactor in a state of criticality. And, Will Tony run this page up his management tree?

The hope is that the price for a 4 watt led light designed by Acriche will drop from $ 50.00 to about $20.00 and the 70 Million needed to make the project quite profitable for the Carolina residents who are smart enough to buy 20 bulbs. They will get the total reward over the 10 year run at the reduced power cost in the range of $500 Billion dollars. Only 105 Million lights are needed at 30 lights per household.

The second benefit of shutting down and converting 8 Nuclear reactors to natural gas or clean coal fuel will also lower the cost of the power as well. And the reduced amount of the horrible solid waste that the government will have to dispose of will benefit America as well.

So, the “Carolina LED Light Pilot Project” will tell everybody exactly how good life can be for people who buy a lot of LED Lights and start putting money in the bank for other power reducing projects like solar panels. The question is why wait for the $20.00 LED Light when the $50.00 light will also return the $500 Billion dollars? In that case one does not have to ask Acriche (or anybody else) to do anything. r.j.g. 8/24/09

Reduce your electricity bill by $85.00 per month by installing 24 L.E.D. Lights. Wow! Environmental Physicist R.J. Gramm has studied many of the manufacturers and he has added information about them on his web site www.exonerateco2.com Tell everybody to go there.

Mr. Gramm suggests that a practical way to cut the electric bill down is to install at least 24 lights like the ZetaLux, 7 Watt LED Light, made by Advanced Lumonics, LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. This LED light will screw into the existing light sockets and will produce the light of a conventional 60 watt bulb except that it reduces the power consumed by 53 watts. That also results in a savings due to the reduction of the air conditioning load. Since LED Lights have been proven to have a long life in their 30 years of existence, they are likely to save money for about 10 years after they pay for themselves.

Mr. Gramm suggests that 24 or these high tech lights (3 packs of 8 bulbs) in locations with the most use will pay for themselves in about 10 months. If the cost of each light is $ 35.99, the $ 863.76 dollar investment will be paid off by an electric bill decrease of about $ 85.00 per month, $ 1,020.00 dollars per year. Having the electric utility pay for your LED Lights also generates happiness, He says.

The subsequent 10 years can have the effect of a $ 10,200.00 tax free income paid for by the reduced electric bill. Most of the EarthLed Lights are UL Approved and the utility will not stop you from installing them. Some utilities are encouraging the installation of LED Lights after they found out that the recently developed Compact Fluorescent Lights are failing before the first 600 hours (about 20 % they say) and the likely life is predicted to be only 2,500 hours, a far cry from the 10,000 hour stated life. The DOE and UL are greatly hurt by this sad story. Lowes and Home Depot have a problem because of that as well as the Mercury disposal problem for millions of the CFLs already in stock as well those sold.

There is another good news aspect to choosing North and South Carolina for this project because if all the households use these environmentally safe lights, enough power will be saved to allow closing down many of the 14 Nuclear Reactors that surround Charlotte and Columbia. They are contaminating all the drinking water in the Carolinas with at least 14,000 Curies per year of Radio-Active Tritiated Water. The only people that know about this problem are the people who have already visited the exonerateco2 web site. Most of the newspaper editors or publishers in the Carolinas were contacted about this a few months ago and it is hoped that the medical professionals have been contacted to see if there has been a 30 year cover up by DOE and their predecessors. Hopefully Genetic Experts will be called upon to see if there is an additional harm to children, new babies and pregnant women.

There is a lot information on the earthled.com site and this link takes one to the store and allows for getting price information, detailed design and performance information. Be sure to mention that “LedLightAmerica” sent you to Earth LED for a quote and/or the opportunity to make a purchase.

There is one additional situation that the people in the Carolinas deserve to know about and that is a “Secondary Exposure” to the Tritiated Water from the Gulf Stream. The sad fact is that the release of 32.000 curies per year from the 32 reactors that contaminate the Mississippi River Basin is added to the 14,000 curies from the Carolinas and since the Gulf of Mexico is only 100 feet deep (which is why it gets so warm and why the Sun heats the Water in the Gulf), the Gulf Stream carries it all around the edge of Florida and up the East Coast to all the swimmers on vacation. The 46,000 curies per year can contaminate a heck of a lot of warm water which floats on top of the ocean water in the Gulf Stream.

Neither NOAA or the EPA Safe Water people have any interest to monitor all that Tritiated Water and only mentions the “Tritium” part of the bad water and look the other way when it becomes part of the bodies of the innocent and unsuspecting citizens. More details are outlined in the exonerateco2 site.

Everybody in the Carolinas should contact their local newspaper editors and ask them how much they found out about the potential harm to their DNA, their life and the life (and health) of all their children, friends and relatives. Don’t be chicken little. Buy some LED Lights ASAP and install them.

We need a grass roots effort to exonerate CO2, stop the Carbon Credit scam and go after those people who know about all the Tritiated Water produced by the nuclear industry. Get Busy. Buy a lot of LED Lights, stop using the electric clothes dryer, cook on the grill and start buying a solar electric system. r.j.g. 8/27/09

In the 3 previous pages, some old bird in Pittsburgh explained about how Acriche has scooped the industry with a super chip that eliminates all the circuitry usually associated with running LED Lights by putting it on the same chip.

As an experienced enterpriser with 3 good patents with my name on them and 2 that the illustrious USPTO killed ( to look at the last one see www.uspto-broken.com ), I can assure that the 17 year life of a patent is much too short and is often divulged before the patent issues because of a sweetheart deal with Globalist types. The 17 years should be tripled to, say, 51 years and South Korea can probably pass legislation in their own country that does that. But, take no chances and copyright everything including the exact series of pictures laying out the chip the way Intel and Microsoft do using as few drawings as possible and as many words as possible to describe what the picture is even to the point that the picture can be avoided. One picture may be worth 1000 words but 1000 words Copyrighted is worth 50 years of protection.

In the case of Seoul Semi, with 1700 patents, it must surely be true that many have already expired and many are about to expire and even a new one only has, say only 14 years left because of early disclosure and theft. A lot of money has been spent to get you this far and from now forward Seoul should carefully word the claims so that nobody can really figure exactly what to do and any machinery must be kept proprietary even to the point of abandoning to protect everything. People like GE are, no doubt, working on the ones ready to expire in 3 or 4 years and will have stuff out in the market for trials about 6 months before the expiration dates. This reduces the effective life to only 10 years or less.

Seoul does not need somebody telling them what to do. Something for nothing is worth what you pay for it and that is the way things are. However, the objectives of this enterpriser is to shut down the Nuclear Power Plants in order to stop them from continuing to release all the Tritiated Water into all the drinking water in the USA. This can be done with the money saved by installing LED Lights and nobody can stop that from happening. Therefore, LEDLightAmerica is a transparent motivator of a change that America needs and it can be brought about by every day American citizens who can profit by the utility payments that they will not have to pay.

If Seoul Semi can not take the plunge and do some good to drastically get the 110 billion chips made and spread around, the Chinese will surely do the job even if they do not have as good of a way to do it and America will buy them because the time to do it is right now. That is why I am making inquiries around the world and will continue to do it as long as it takes with my own funding if nobody with big bucks steps forward.

America needs to shape up the distribution of power as well as reducing the need like the LED Lights can do. My other web site www.3-windows.com has some really good ideas for that and soon I will be posting my Post Office box number there as well as on the USPTO-broken site. Acriche can do some good in that arena by selling a lot of LED Lights in the Deerfield Michigan area as soon as possible because Commonwealth has been mis-managed for many years and can’t produce the power or the repairs fast enough. I hope they have some customers for Acriche bulbs up there. They get 1700 outages per year, which is some kind of record, and all the people up there are sure to spring the bucks to buy the Led Lights.

I will not have the time to post this because of some urgent projects I am working upon.

I hope that my soap box speech has not bored the Seoul Management and if it did that is OK too.

Thinking about this over the weekend, the conclusion was that my advanced age means that I am unlikely to see definitive results on this project and the best thing I can do is dig a little bit deeper and find out who the 3 players that rank above Seoul Semi and contact them as well and see how fancy they are. There is something wrong when China buys 4 each of the 1000 mva Nuclear Power Plants when ½ the same money would get them ten times the return on their need for electric power by selling LED Lights to themselves. They are stuck making and using the antique incandescent bulbs when it is obvious how dumb that is when the 90% reduction of energy offered by L.E.D. Lights is considered. They learned that from the USA and they are stuck in it. Soon they will be stuck with antique and harmful nuclear waste generating machines that will mess up their water supply (the old Westinghouse mistakes) that will harm them for millions of years if they actually complete the construction. r.j.g. 9/1/09

Table 1. 2007 Summary Statistics (North Carolina)
Item	Value	U.S.Rank
NERC Region(s)		SERC
Primary Energy Source		Coal
Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)	27,644	12
Electric Utilities	25,500	4
Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power	2,144	34
Net Generation (megawatthours)	130,115,301	11
Electric Utilities	123,215,621	4
Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power	6,899,680	35
Emissions (thousand metric tons)
Sulfur Dioxide	365	7
Nitrogen Oxide	61	27
Carbon Dioxide	78,533	12
Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)	6.2	13
Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)	1.0	39
Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)	1,331	28
Total Retail Sales (megawatthours)	131,880,754	9
Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours)	131,880,754	7
Direct Use (megawatthours)	2,742,956	14
Average Retail Price (cents/kWh)	7.83	27
MWh = Megawatthours. kWh = Kilowatthours.

As one can see, North Carolina is doing a good job with many safe, Nuclear Free, conventional facilities producing power at a low cost to their customers without producing any Radio-Active Tritiated Water or horrible, dangerous solid waste which will be producing harmful radio-Active materials for millions of years. The Nuclear Plants in the following chart have a capacity of 4,973 Mega Watts. The use of 92 million 60 watt LED Lights, saving 54 watts per LED, can eliminate the need for those Nuclear Plants. At $30.00 per LED ( $2.76 Billion), paid for at the expense of reduced electric bills, it is a good deal that will return $ 2.76 Billion per year to the consumers in reduced cost for each of the next 10 years. WOW.

*Base Type: E26/27
*Input Voltage: 85~240V AC
*Produces No UV or IR Radiation
*Light Engines: 3 Watt CREE XRE
*Luminous Flux: 150 Lumens (Cool), 100 Lumens (Warm)
*Physical Dimensions:
*Overall Length – 3.92 in, Length from Base of Socket – 2.93 in, Diameter – 2.03in
*Beam Angle – 180 degrees overall
*Operating Temp: < 127 F / 53 C
*Lifespan: >50,000 Hours
*Construction: Composite Main Housing, Aluminum Heat sink, Frosted White Dispersion Lense
*Base Types Available: E26/27
*Color Temperatures – Warm White, Cool White

Cost to run for one year – $1.30
Calculated assuming 12 Hours a day operation, 365 Days a Year with .10 KWh Electricity Cost

A 4 pack from Earth Led is $ 100.00 and 5 each of the 4 packs may qualify for additional discounts for the folks in the Carolinas who decide to really cut the light bill down. To put this into perspective: One – 3 Watt EarthLED DesignoLux CL-3 costs approximately $1.30 to run per year at 12 hours per day. Since it was on for approximately 4000 hours it still has nearly 10 years of life! Throughout its entire 11 year life, a DesignoLux CL-3 will cost approximately $35 including the cost of the CL-3, while a traditional fixture using an incandescent bulb will cost nearly $230! Therefore, a group of 20 bulbs working over the 11 years can provide $4,600.oo in tax free income instead of paying the utility. We are working to figure out the reduction in power because of the reduced air conditioning load for a 20 light household over the same period. In this example there is also an additional savings of $230.00 in air conditioning cost over the 10 year period bring the total Economic Happiness to $ 4830.00 WOW.

LED Lights create Economic Happiness as well as providing flicker free, pleasant light. consumerreports.org/cro/appliances/heating-cooling/air-conditioners was a great help in calculating the 5% additional savings from the project with 20, 3 watt LEDs. r. j. g. 9/8/09

It was pleasing to see that the shipping cost of a package of 50 each, 3 Watt Led Lights from China to North Carolina was only $115.00 ( $115/50bulbs = $2.30 per bulb ). This is a good price for a rush Factory to Household project which is a good thing to do no matter what.. It may be worth while to consider an order to get started, right now: Call that PLAN 1.

The price for the LED Lights from China is so low that this businessman does not want to disclose it at present because a shipping container ( 8 ft x 8 ft x 32 ft ) with 2014 cubic feet of volume can hold 100 of the 60 x 29 x 20 inch boxes of 50 pieces for the 3-Watt bulbs. That makes it so that shipping 5,000 pieces in 50 containers of 100 boxes may be a lot less than $11,500.00 to get it to the Lowes warehouse in Charlotte, NC, for example, or the best electrical distributor in the state.

A suitable sale plan with appropriate newspaper and TV publicity announces that a joint “CHINA DIRECT TO YOU SALE”, on a certain date, at a specific site, has arrived with 5000 of the REVOLUTIONARY, UL Approved, 3 WATT L.E.D. Lights that do the job of a 30 Watt Antique Bulb. Therefore, each of the bulbs saves 27 watts of power capacity.

A 50 pack from Earth Led ( and/or LEDLightAmerica) is $1, 050.00 and qualifies for a $2.00 per bulb Rebate in exchange for 12 monthly utility bill statements using these long life bulbs as (well as the previous 12 month bills for comparison purposes) This offer is for the folks in the Carolinas who decide to really cut the light bill down and show what can really happen as a pilot project for the Carolinas.

To put this into perspective: One – 3 Watt EarthLED DesignoLux CL-3 costs approximately $1.30 to run per year at 12 hours per day. Since it was on for approximately 4000 hours it still has nearly 10 years of life! Throughout its entire 11 year life, a DesignoLux CL-3 will cost approximately $35 including the cost of the CL-3, while a traditional fixture using an incandescent bulb will cost nearly $230! Therefore, a group of 50 bulbs working over the 11 years can provide $11,500.00 in tax free income instead of paying the utility. A typical household should have at least 25 bulbs in service to qualify for the rebate. For a 25 light household over the same period. In this example there is also an additional savings of $575.00 in air conditioning load cost over the 10 year period bringing the total Economic Happiness to $ 12,075.00 WOW. Say, $6,035.50 for a pair of relatives who jointly buy the 50 lot boxes.

LED Lights create Economic Happiness as well as providing flicker free, pleasant light. consumerreports.org/cro/appliances/heating-cooling/air-conditioners was a great help in calculating the 5% additional savings from the project with 25, 3 watt LEDs in service in each household.

Knowing that 49% of the electric power is residential in nature is a great help in eliminating the Nuclear Plants by making them unnecessary with conservation and LED Lights.

So far “LEDLightAmerica” has concerned itself with a small number of designs and sizes because as the volume of the 3-watt sized units goes up the price goes down. And, the decision for the purchase of the LEDs is in the hands of the residential households, the residents will benefit greatly from the purchase in the short term as well into the long term because the LEDs inherently have a long life.

And, the decrease in air conditioning load because the LEDs remove 90% of the lighting load, the power is reduced by about 5% more because there is less air conditioning to do. The electric company basically pays for the LEDs and then suffers for another 10 years and, it benefits the residents the whole time. It is almost as beneficial as turning off a light and leaving it off for 11 years except the light is still available at practically no cost. It is a lot better than using candle lighting and burning your house down. Even in an emergency, a good LED flash light is much safer and convenient than candles and marches.

My grand parents on my mother’s side lived in a log cabin with a dirt kitchen floor with some boards laid down. They had a small farm and 11 children to help out and having candle power in 1901 was very popular and necessary. Oil lamps were a luxury. The wood stove in the kitchen kept most of the house habitable. Having incandescent lighting is popular today but it is quickly becoming un-necessary and the Nuclear Power plants built to service the great expansion in lighting will become obsolete much like the buggy whip and the gas mantle. A 100 watt incandescent bulb is a residential luxury that is now obsolete because of LED Lights. The same is true for a 75 Watt, a 40 watt, a 30 watt and a 25 watt which really has a flimsy filament that burns out in the wink of an eye.

The switch over to LED Lighting will happen so fast that the politicians and the incandescent bulb makers are shaking in their boots because there is nothing they can do to stop it or control it. All of the benefits will go to the power consumers who buy the LED bulbs and the essentially tax free benefits of the ownership of the bulbs will not be taxable for years to come.

In the not too distant future, “LED Light Theft” will start to show up and will be very difficult to control. Then, “Secure LED Lights” will be made theft proof. The point of all this is that America is in an urgent transformation from utility enslaved “consumers” to sophisticated high tech enterprisers with product volume much higher than the computer sales causing out of work pencil pushers. The enterpriser gets started with the first wave of LED buying to demonstrate that the bill from the utility really will go down enough to pay for the LEDs. Then, the extra money available from that every month for years to come will give more spending power that will benefit the owner for more effort in that direction until we are FREE from the clutches of the utility like my grand parents were.

So, there is much more motivation to get busy buying as many LED Lights as can be manufactured in the shortest time than simply making money and lowering the cash out flow. It is to become part of a better life in the future without obligation to anyone. Life is difficult during periods of financial troubles and when the light bill can not be paid it causes many problems that tend to make our world smaller and less fruitful. Having an extra 100 bucks a month because of the purchase of LED Lights paid for by the light company is only the first step to economic and personal FREEDOM that that we never had the possibility of when the bill collectors were lined up outside the front door.

Next, we will surely start to get rid of the heating bill with practical application of solar panels that we buy because of the lower electric bill. And, less solar panel money will be needed to provide the lights in the solar heated house. Home builders have to be solicited to buy fancy architectural LED Lights.

But before we can do that, we need some electric enterprisers to buy a bunch of the commercial style LED Lights from China for the 2^nd wave of the LED Light Revolution that stops these insidious nuclear power types from contaminating everything. The time to FREE the Carolinas from the clutches of the Nuclear Power Plants messing up our water, our air and our land is about to start. That is the way some old bird in Pittsburgh thinks about the future and if you agree , buy a bunch of LED lights (residential and/or commercial ) tomorrow. Pressure your big building owners to kick the electric lighting habit as soon as you can with letters, visits and grass roots activity the day after tomorrow. The switch over for the 51 % of the power to LEDs requires far fewer decision maker to get busy. r. j. g. 9/11/09

As you will see on the web site www.exonerateco2.com an American “Environmental Physicist” (He only has one BS Degree in Physics, 1958) has moved forward from proving that Carbon Dioxide is the only food growing gas on planet Earth that grows all the food for all life forms and, that, the Principal Green House Gas is Water Vapor that keeps us all warm and safe from the cold vacuum of outer space and the hostile universe.

Now that that is done, the project has moved forward to LED Lights that have never gotten any serious development in America. He has taken it upon himself to sell the citizens in the Carolinas at least 25 of the 3-Watt bulbs in each residence as a way to shut down the Nuclear Power Plants which are poisoning all the people with Radio-Active Tritiated Water that is released into all the drinking water from the Nuclear Plants. Something on the order of 70 million to 100 million such bulbs are required in the Carolinas to make an impact on the Electric Utilities involved. At first it may sound silly that such little lights can have a big impact on all the Utilities involved. There is POWER in numbers. The author has invested 5 years of his life in this activity and hopes to stay alive long enough to see visible results.

After spending many hours searching the web looking for 3-watt or 4-watt LED bulbs, this author, R.J.Gramm has concluded that LED Lights is a poorly coordinated market in America and in China as well. Page 2-T Plans for Friends in China, why only 3-Watts? Illustrates how things are.

. After all, across the USA there is a great need for much more than 1OO BILLION such bulbs and the sooner this happens the better it will be for America.

The illustrious Department Of Energy (DOE) has promoted the use of Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) and they are failing and they have a short life. The companies that took the “Energy Star” bait (GE, Sylvania and others) have swamped the big stores with those Mercury contaminated losers. DOE has set the progress of LED Lights back for the last 30 years while they promote the calling of CO2 "Pollution". Our National business and Political leaders are buying into firms selling Carbon Credits. And, Our Presidents have led China down the road of Nuclear Proliferation with 4 new Nuclear Plants (that will poison a lot of drinking water) when China should be spending the money on LED Lights which will easily drop the requirements for Electric Plant construction by about 30%. The whole thing sounds like a Horror Movie filled with dastardly intentions and criminal behavior. Out legislators will have to back track the harm they are attempting.

So LedLightAmerica is asking all the LED Light Manufacturers in China to get busy with “China-Direct Led Lights to America” and help to get involved in this and advise if their business policies allow the direct sale to American Citizens in the Carolinas as a pilot project and, then, Across America, A S A P.

The exonerateco2.com recently opened a Post Office Box in an attempt to expedite the project. The results of this page will be posted on the web. The world as well as America will be better off as a result of having some facts about what is going on. On the local level, the key to this is to find electrical distributors who can keep the big picture of America on their mind and promote the “China-Direct” principal for a portion of the costs to distribute the lights, protect them from theft and potential abuse of the customer cash paid so that it gets back to the manufacturers. They will be middlemen with an agenda to make things better in America. They will build good and happy customers for future business as a result of fair minded work on this project and will be able to move into large commercial and industrial lighting as a result.

.We are going to heed the help of the National Association of Electrical Distributors to assist in finding interested Distributors so an e-mail was sent to customerservice@naed.org today to get the ball rolling.

We are going to need at least 500 factories making 50 million LED Lights per year in order to have 100 Billion lights spread across America over a 4 year period. China hopefully has about 1000 factories and will be pleased to work hard for us even though they have their own needs to fill.

For that reason, it is necessary to spend a lot of effort looking for companies around the world that can make 3 or 4 watt led lights at a rate of 100 or more pieces per hour around the clock for a long time.

The first manufacturing contact that has been contacted been contacted and hopefully they can stimulate fellow LED Light Manufacturers to get involved. Perhaps there is a China National Association of Led Light Manufacturers? CNALLM

Oh, No one alone like this author with a lot of pipe dreams is going to make an impact and, therefore, interested people who like the way the web site and the involvement in LED Lights has been presented so far will contact the author, set some goals and get busy.

PLAN 3, sell from a store, any store, or a distributer willing to purchase in lots of 25 pieces @ $525.00 for the lot with the same rebate rules ucing 25 bulbs in the same household and bill/statement rules.

The reason that a low 3 watt LED has been chosen for the pilot project is because there is less chance for failures because the operating temperature is guaranteed by the laws of nature on the subject of heat dissipation from the chip through the cooling band around the bottom (about 4.9 square inches which means that the heat flux is about 0.61 watts per square inch) is only warm to the touch. The low operating temperature makes the life more likely to be very long , in the 50,000 hour range, as a result.

“A few eggs in a basket rather than one big egg” applies because 2 of the 3 watt bulbs are used rather than a 6 watt replacement LED. One of the Y shaped double socket adaptors is ueed to take the place of a 60 watt conventional bulb. At the next size up, 3 of the 3 watt bulbs take the place of a 100 watt incandescent power hog. In this case two of the double socket assemblies are used and fitted into the lamp socket.

This author is suggesting that this way there will not be any hot and costly 12 of 13 watt LEDS running and the 3-watt Led volume will improved because of a lower price and still lower as time goes by. However, buying 100 watt replacement LED light is STILL a good idea and will surely be better and longer lasting than the dumb Mercury contaminated CFLs that DOE likes Earth Led has the best design so far. r.j.g. 9/9/9

Because of the work that was invested into ( www.exonerateco2.com ) and spending time to circulate the up dates (to any and all e-mail addresses that I could find) as the barriers to getting things changed presented themselves, it became apparent that the tax on electric energy was really going to happen because of the culture inside the beltway. Also, there was a discovery that Tritiated Water was the threat to all of America and that there was little that I could do about it. It was called “Tritium” on the EIA web site (with no mention of it having been oxidized to Tritiated Water) that was being released into virtually all of America’s water sheds. But, amazingly, the EPA already had an arbitrary (pro-Nuclear) high standard published. There was nothing that could be done about that by some old guy in Pittsburgh. The 69 pages produced about Tritiated Water (including pictures of the EPA gal and the new DOE guy that need a meeting with the new President) are not going to do any good either.

The discovery that DOE likes all the funny and dangerous Atomic Style “Light Sources” instead of L.E.D. Lights and, ORNL was STILL working on Fusion Power, convinced me that Anti Advocacy against all of the bad things being done by the government was a waste if my valuable time. CO2 was EXONERATED in my mind but the work to get the new President to do something was (is) totally un-realistic. The large amount of Carbon Credit Propaganda and the promotion of Nuclear Power personally Promoted by the Presidency is too much for some old duck in Pittsburgh to overcome.

However, by appealing to the enterprisers in America who believe in promoting the interests of America by taking risks, doing hard work that looks out for our freedom, is a sure way to get stuff done without having to do the fighting on a playing field tilted in favor of the Political Reality, DOE, The President, The Supreme Court, and The Congress. They all love the CO2 Myth, Carbon Credits, Nuclear Power and spending money that favors that kind of stuff. They do not have to worry about the harm to the Human Genome if they don’t know about it and no body has the Power and Influence to tell them. The very reasons why all the complaining by the Anti Nuclear advocates (who have de-generated to a bunch of do good web sites with DONATE BUTTONS) have not done any good are still in existence. There is no Superman who can insist on TRUTH, JUSTICE and the AMERICAN WAY.

Therefore, LedLightAmerica.com (or a close substitute depending on internet availability when the site is prepared) will be a place showing how to get L.E.D. Lights installed and personally benefit from the reduction of electric Utility payments that will result as a benefit of installing the Led Lights. It will be possible that some of the Anti-Nuclear folks can use the good that reducing Power Consumption will do and they have the opportunity to do that. The MAIN PURPOSE of LedLightAmerica.com will be to FREE PEOPLE FROM HIGH ELECTRICITY COSTS without even having to think about all the ineffective Anti Nuclear stuff.

As things now stand, The LED Light Revolution has started and all of the little baby LED Light Enterprisers are out there doing business. They can get sales of fancy Led Lights as well as cheap Led Lights. They can get business with Big Sets of Led Lights as well as small special purpose lights for theatrical purposes or even making good lighting at the dinner table. They are doing it and America’s lighting load is going down no matter what the people in the beltway believe.

Therefore, LedLightAmerica.com will be loaded with links to every led light web site that can be found with the classic American Outlook for the good life in America including a Low Power Bill. Very expensive, Gold Plated Led Lights are good. Flash Lights and Led Lights for Camping Out are good. They are ALL good. Led Lights from China, from South Korea and from Canada as well as the ones from small American start ups. We are behind in technology because of the failure of the people inside the beltway, but that is not enough to prevent our ultimate position as Leaders in the Use of Led Lights which will truly help the Energy Picture in America. Keep in mind that the Patents only last 17 years. They tell everybody what to do starting the 18^th year.

All people involved in the Manufacture, Sale and Installation of Led Lights in America are important to the future of America. The Revolution will go forward because it is the right thing to do. It is the right time to do it. When times are tough, America has always used those times to set New Directions and to do more, faster as well as better. The idea of selling high volume, specific out-put ranges that can lead to “standard” designs and the lowest initial cost are desirable goals for LedLightAmerica.com but not an overriding concept.

This is all bad news for the antique bulb manufacturers who do not get busy with their line of led lights. It is a Buggy Whip and Gas Mantle situation for sure. There is some hope. See 1 inch square GE White LEDs at

www.lumination.com/product.php?id=56. What they need next is some 120 volt packaging with a screw base. They got stuck with CFLs and don't know what to do.

When one first looks at the above page from the link on Page 3 at the bottom (just above this page), it suggests that the GE start up in thinking about LED Lights in 1962, along with a contact in Japan, might really be a good competitor to acrichie and the Clee people.

The question is: how can we get the 3 approaches to be worked together? That is, how can we get GE, acrichie and Clee to put out a standard bulb, heat sink and Edison base package that can use any of the 3 suppliers in a UL package in the 3 or 4 watt size so as to assure that the consumer is safe from people who make mistakes or who do not control their sources properly?

Up to this point, GE has shot themselves in the foot on the CFLs on the advice of DOE who pointed to the Bush energy act that 100 watt bulbs would be made illegal at the end of 2009 and all they had to do to guarantee sales was to put out some UL 100 watt equivalent CFL designs to fill the need for that market. Mercury be damned, that will be solved and a 20,000 hour life is OK for now.

This author knows that it is easy to open an office and put up a web site with nothing behind it. There is A LOT behind www.lumination.com (and www.LED.com which takes you to lumination). This author knows that there are a lot of good electronics type of people who can jump into the GE site and come up with a good 3 0r 4 watt design that will run nice and cool for 50,000 hours and not get into trouble. Then idea is to get Bill at Lumination, William.pointkowski3@ge.com to quote a 50 piece box of 4 watt cards that will be easy to apply at 110 volts and fit on an Edison base and heat sink (and have a polycarbonate bulb that can be used to screw the unit into a socket without breaking off) which will pass a rigid UL test. The same set of parts should also be applicable for the acrichie 4 watt and Clee as well. Such a scheme will help America. I am asking tony.kinard@acrichie.com to also, somehow, get together with mark@earthled.com to participate in the supply chain to expedite the overall process. Mark is constantly doing work to introduce quality designs to the market on a regular basis anyway so that the competitive aspects of helping America can be dealt with.

Looking at the inventory of the local Lowes and seeing a bunch of GE CFLs is a liability for both Lowes, DOE and GE. The essence of successful business is to turn all liabilities into assets.

“ GE is going to abandon the production of Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) in favor of L.E.D. Lights made by the LED experts of GE, www.lumination.com

GE wants to assure that the CFLs already made will be disposed of in an environmentally friendly way and has worked with the Department Of Energy, a system of registering every bulb being replaced so that after that bulb serves it’s purpose, a national disposal system will be established, Run By DOE, that will authorize a Certificate for one (1) GE 3 or 4 Watt LED replacement at ½ the market price. If you buy a good GE compact fluorescent light from Lowes you can be sure that it will pay for itself many times over the cost of the light before it has to be replaced and, the LED Light replacement that you buy at the reduced price will be an environmentally friendly product with a very long life. “

General Electric has been developing ways of making LED Lights since 1962 and with assistance of their partner in Japan, they have brought the products far enough forward to allow large quantities of residential LED Lights to be made that will last about 2 times , or more, longer than the CFLs.

This author understands that suggesting that people work together in the interests of America may be a bit naive but, in today’s global thinking, it would not be unrealistic to inject any player from China who understands the Clee chips and is already making large quantities.

Contact with irving.pun@civillight.com has already been made and it may well be that Bill from Lumination ought to contact Irving to get a handle on what things in China are like on LED Lights as compared with the heavy industry CFLs that the GE folks have already made contact with. The last person who puts his name on a product is the “manufacturer” and the subscript “Made in China” suggests that the Manufacturer owns a part of the China operation. Not so, made in China is only a simple statement and it is more likely that the simple business arrangement as a “Contract Manufacturer”. GE, Sylvania and DOE have got to get together and switch to LED Lights NOW.

The e-mail to the sales mrg. at lumination got through but Bill must have moved. r.j.g. 10/4/09

Web sites to people getting the job done, with a starting point model shown:

www.theledlight.com 1 dozen selections, they are working on it. MR-PL-DL E27 (2.5 w, equ 25 watts)

Also show pear shaped A19 bulb on E27 base LY-PCB-A19SSC-DL - A19 Bulb, equ 40 watts www.greenandmore.com good selection, click on led lights EL-LICL3E ( 3watt, equ 45 watts)

www.earthled.com rated#1 by greenhome.huddler.com CL-3 light bulb ( 3 watt equ 40 watts)

www.lc-led.com 56 led globe, plastic, others too, GLOBE56 (3.6 watts equiv 55Watts) $39

This page will be improved after a deal is worked out with listed people who want to promote helping America and give economic power in place of the wasted electric power they now spend for the Antique Incandescent Electric Lighting.

This author is planning to get everybody selling L.E.D. Lights to report on their web site the following:

Size, quantity and price information is not needed or desirable because all the other affiliates listed are competitors even though they have a common goal of making America Better.

R.J. Gramm is seeking affiliates who would be listed on a web site (as shown above) that encourages the purchase of 20 to 40 led lights. The object being to drastically reducing the national lighting load requiring about 20 billion led lights in the 40 to 75 watt incandescent size. And, being priced so as to drop the customers annual lighting cost by about ½ the same amount the first year as the cost of the group of lights purchased. Links would always point to specific designs as illustrated by the Links on page 2.

The message is to agree that the various suppliers are not greedy competitors, but rather Partners in quickly switching over to the new method by recognizing that 1000 suppliers would have a difficult (and profitable) time supplying the 20 Billion lights heeded (20 Billion lights / 1000 suppliers = 20 million led lights per supplier).

There is a second thought. It is that the consumer will think BIG and not the way of ordering “samples” but rather ordering a bunch of “reliable, money makers” that will save America and loosen up money for the buyers for the next 10 years.

So, by listing “LedLightAmerica” (subject to change on the day that the web site is registered) every supplier on the list will be promoted as being a reliable and cost/quality supplier with the objective of serving America, the customer and the environment. And the list will continuously increased while we all look at the results obtained by reporting affiliate sales LED Watts and Power Capacity Reductions on their web site which will accumulate and show the progress being made.

It is intended that no fee will be charged to the suppliers and the payment made to the web site will be less than 3% as determined by each supplier. Look at the rules for the affiliate for www.LEDLight.com

Sent to ; sales@theledlight.com ; earthledsales@earthled.com ; sales@marktechledlighting.com ; contactus@earthtechproducts.com ; info@goforleds.com ; ledmate@gmail.com ; sales@lcled.com

Do you know anything about LED Lights? For example a 2.3 Watt LED Light from LEDLight.com ( Product Code 45859) takes the place of a 45 Watt conventional incandescent Bulb and will last a long time, say 50,000 hours of run time?

If you bought 25 of these money saving, cool running, High Tech Winners at $20.00 each, there is a good possibility that they would reduce your electricity bill in a years time about as much as you paid for the LED Lights! It depends on where you install them and how long they are turned on.

For example if your electricity bill is more than 550 KWH (Kilo Watts Hours) per month and your furnace , dishwasher, TV and microwave use is about 250 KWH per month it would mean that your lighting load is 300 KWH per month and (with care) the LEDs could cut that by 90%. A 300 KWH per month reduction at $ 0.136 per KWH multiplies out to $40.80 per month, x 12 = $489.60 per year.

The difference between 2.3 Watts for the LED Light that produces as much light as a 45 Watt incandescent bulb is so big that it sounds too good to be true. Things that sound too good to be true usually are not. What is happening is that there is a “LED Light Revolution” in progress and all around the world everybody is pushing forward as fast as they can to take advantage of it.

Many places that have a shortage of electricity generation capacity have electric utilities promoting the use of LED Lights with great results. The Duquesne Light Company does not suggest that such lights be used in the Pittsburgh Area because it would lower the amount of power delivered and lower the money that customers pay. Duquesne Light has a Pro Nuclear Culture left over by being the company who suffered through the worlds first commercial Nuclear Power Station at Shipping Port where My Uncle Elmer worked for many years.

Things have changed. All the highly radio-active, dangerous nuclear waste now sitting at Beaver Valley is proof that the basic idea is bad. All the releases of Radio-Active Tritiated Water that is released into the Ohio River (and into the Beaver Valley Air as Tritiated Water Vapor) is causing fear that the that (radio-active) Water can become part of the human body and cause mutations of our DNA and sickness of all kinds. These kinds of thoughts add to the LED Light Revolution because less power output means less harm released from the reactors that continuously produce a very long list of very bad stuff.

Persons with interest in this can go to www.exonerateco2.com to get the whole LED Light story and how the LED Lights were discovered to be popular just about everywhere but in Pittsburgh PA. The basic idea is for the people of Western Pennsylvania, call it 1 million Residential power customers to buy and put into service 22 each Product Code 45859, 2.3 Watt LED Light Lights and tell everybody what happened to their electric bill. It would make Western PA a Pioneer in Lighting Conservation and release about 300 Million Kilo Watt Hours of power per month (Valued at $41 million Dollars per month) available for other purposes over the next 10 years. Call it a $490 Million Dollar Economic Improvement per Year ( $ 4.9 Billion Dollars over 10 years, and more ) that would allow the attraction of more people and businesses to our wonderful area full of wonderful people.

Do you think that spending $490 Million Dollars the first year (to get a $490 Million Dollar electric savings for 1 million residential customers and returning $ 4.9 Billion Dollars benefit over a 10 year time period) is a good idea?

Thomas Edison Did A Good Job and we have all benefited greatly. Now we have the opportunity to do 10 times better than Edison and lead the way for the World just as we have with all the electric lights around the world. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that spending $490.00 out of pocket to reduce your electric bill by $490.00 per year and get the same benefit for the next 10 years (because the LED Lights are likely to last that long).

Do you think that Duquesne Light will promote this project as a good thing for Western PA?

The thing to do is to put yourself and the health and welfare of the western PA area AHEAD of the income that Duquesne Light now receives and give them some room to be able to increase the future load of new businesses, electric cars and a well planed conversion of Beaver Valley Nukes to fuel fired boilers.

The 32 Nuclear Reactors in our “Basic American Vacation Land” are just filled up with Nuclear Power Plants and hardly any other kind of power plant. The area has a “Nuclear Infection” with Radio-Active Tritiated Water Vapor discharged from the plants and blowing around in all directions as well as the dangerous Tritiated Water that is dumped into virtually all the fresh water rivers and streams. Each plant has two 1,000 MW Capacity reactors.

With 32,000 Mega Watts of capacity, and 40% being the lighting Load, it means that the lighting load of 12,800 MW can be knocked down to only 1,280 MW, a reduction of 11,520 MW. This is like having almost 13 Nuclear Power Reactors shut down by installing only 426,666,000 pieces of 3 watt led lights doing the job of 426,666,000 of the obsolete 30 watt incandescent bulbs. Goliath is being taken down with a single Hi-Tech BB instead of a fist size rock.

This means that only 426,666,000 high quality $50.00 Led Lights = $ 21.3 Billion Dollars to make the 13 NEW Nuclear Plants (worth $ 130 Billion Dollars) that do not have to be built.

Further, because of the reduced power bill, the area consumers will pay for the LED lights during the first 2 years with the money they do not have to pay the power companies! The next 8 or 9 years will still be low cost electricity and the electric energy tax will be lower as well. The air conditioning load will also go down because the Incandescent lights put out a heck of a lot of heat.

One of the suppliers on page 4 , www.earthled.com , sent in the following link to their dimmable 4 Watt

http://store.earthled.com/products/earthled-lumiselect-powerglobe-dimmable-led which is a smart buy. They are located in Florida (a state that allows above ground storage of Nuclear Waste in Dry Casks) and this author has asked them to look into how far from them such casks are located. It might be advisable for them to move.

Maybe, after www.NIRS.org , e-mail nirs@main.nc.us , (also located next to all the nukes) realizes that installing led lights by the customers that the Nukes surround in Charlotte (5 nukes, 10 reactors, make a close circle around Charlotte NC and Poison all the drinking water) is the Magic Bullet that they have always needed to get the upper hand in the fight. Hopefully, They will GET BUSY and hold a CRASH, “LED LIGHT REVOLUTION” NEWS MEETING with the able assistance of Ned Ryan Doyle to spread the word along with earthled.com

My daughter and her family live in Charlotte and it grieves my greatly how horrible it is that the US Department Of Energy has kept it quiet how wonderful the Led Lights work and how well they are a Truly Green Alternative to the 13 new nukes that they talked an ignorant President Bush into. It is horrible that they sold him down the garden path to push the Energy Policy Act of 2005 as well as the ARIVA initiative. His silly web site www.climatevision.gov is proof that he swallowed the DOE backed “Global Warming Pill” which was hitherto fore a Democratic medicine. And, the attack against the One and Only, Wonderful, Super, Environmental, Food Growing Gas---CO2 that has been ruled as “pollution” is testimony how bad all the branches of our government have been harmed by DOE.

and Mary at nirs@main.nc.us should communicate and decide how to get in touch with all the people in the South Eastern USA so they can benefit from the project of having the Electric Utilities reduce their cash billings by $ 10 Billion Dollars per year for the first 2 years, while the LED Lights are sold and installed, followed by 8 or more years at $20 Billion that the customers do not pay because of the long life of the LED Lights. That is one heck of a good tax free benefit that can change the financial picture of the South East as well as freeing up time to convert the Nukes to reasonable fuels like natural gas, clean coal that can be mined to build an inventory for conversion to gasoline or gasified coal fuel.

467 million Led Lights at $23.4 Billion Dollars, seems a bit too heavy right now. A quick look at the South East states, compliment of NIRS.org, indicates that more work needs to be done to set the objectives of LedLightAmerica. And then work on the Carolinas with 10 reactors around Charlotte!

The objectives of LedLightsForUSA © Copyright, 2009, R.J.Gramm, Pittsburgh PA are to publicise what the objectives of Mr.Gramm are and how they relate to the agenda (on Page 3). It is not easy to convince the Media at Large, an Electric Utility or a Governmental Agency to do something

1) The Agenda is to establish a web presence that will help people to take advantage of the L.E.D.(Light Emitting Diode) technology by citizens of America that will allow them to Lower Their Lighting Costs and thereby allow for a more prosperous and free life because of the Lower Cost of Electricity.

2) The Big Picture Objective is to lower the out put demand put upon Electric Utilities by a significant percentage so as to make Nuclear Power Un-Necessary by virtue of the reduced payments made by the public at large and the Lowering of the energy that is now consumed.

3) The Agenda is to assist all the Led Light Enterprisers who are out there doing business to report their LED wattage sales so as to get the estimation of the power reductions to be understood by the public and the Electric utilities obtained by using the LED Kilo Watts times a factor of 9 to get Power Reduction.

4) The Big Picture Objective is to build a web site (which R.J.Gramm does not have the resources to do) so that all sellers to the public can know where to send the information and be assured that the total LED KW will be handled in a transparent way and will result in showing the KW Power reduced in America.

Americans have always been free, within the limits of their income, to live the good life and use electricity to make their life better by using all the appliances and conveniences that electric consumption allows. The objective of reducing power can be done to some extent by turning off lights, buying more efficient appliances or even cooking outdoors. But there are some things that, although they lower the consumption, should not be done. Burning your house down will lower consumption. Some people who had their house burned down by hot halogen lamps that started drapes on fire can attest to that. Buying and installing “Energy Star” Compact Fluorescent Lights that contaminate the environment will also lower power and make DOE happy that they approve of and recommend such lights. They are an environmental disaster, DOE knows it but they believe that some “trade offs” are worth while if they approve of them.

The same kind of thinking by DOE, Along with the Power of the Presidency that chairs the NRC and have persuaded both the Senate and the House of Representatives that CO2 is “Pollution” also believe that it is a “Trade OFF” to allow the Nuclear Power Plants to contaminate the Land, Water and Air to produce Electricity that makes our life more convenient. DOE Knows that there are Billions of Gallons of Tritiated Water being Released into all our drinking Water and they deny it. DOE Knows that the Principal Green House Gas is Water Vapor and they deny it. Worse, they know that CO2 is “our one and only principal food growing gas upon which all life on Planet Earth Depends” but they continue the attack on CO2 so that Nuclear Power can have a reason to exist. They want to limit our economy by putting limits on the burning of fuels. DOE Knows that Tritiated Water can seriously harm anyone who drinks it and they deny it. And worse, they put out Fake Expertise on the subject on the subject of understanding of the Genome (that is seriously harmed by Tritiated Water).Therefore, they deny the harm from a position of intellectual superiority and by avoiding the medical community and the REAL Genome Experts.

So, the overall Big Picture Objective of LedLightsForUSA is to beg people to get involved in every and any way that they can, at all levels, as soon as possible, so that the Principle that people will know that “Time Wounds All Heels” will prevail and all of the bad things being done to America will stop.

However, do not let anybody marginalize the good work of making and selling LED Lights because some old guy in Pittsburgh is willing to rail against the worst agency in the history of America. There may not be any laws against all the bad things thus far exhibited by DOE and their beltway co-conspirators. Truth, Justice and the American Way are always under attack from all sides and from within. A truth in advertising is a simple example when we note that DOE’s Energy Information Agency shows 1 million Mega Watts of electric Capacity with the 104 reactors in service contributing only 100 thousand Mega Watts (10%) but all the Nuclear players like to report that Clean, Safe Nuclear Power contributes 20% of the nations needs.

As a starting Point consider 7 Nuclear Plants crowded into the Carolinas. The population of North Carolina ( 9.2 million) and South Carolina (4.8 Million) totals 14 Million People. That is 1 million People for each of the 14 Nuclear Reactors (2 per Plant). They do not know that they hold the world record of 2 Million Innocent Folks for each Nuclear plant. They never voted to have that many. They do not know how much Tritiated Water is being dumped into their water supply. They don’t know what the heck Tritiated water is? They don’t know it is readily made to be part of their bodies and that they can be harmed by it on a very personal basis and for generations to follow.. The one right up the coast line from Myrtle Beach really gets me mad.

What is needed is to contact everybody in those 2 states, get the whole contaminating story on the table and ask them to immediately fill their houses with Led Lights and pressure the Utilities to change their ways and convert the nukes to safe natural gas or clean coal boilers. Lets say there are 4 people per household.

It doesn’t take a Rocket Scientist to divide the 3.5 million Households by 7 Nukes to get 500,000 households per Nuke (3.5 million / 7 Nukes = 0.5 million per Nuke). For lack of a better number one can estimate that each household needs to put about 30 led lights into service (at an average of 4 watts each) at a price of $30.00 each in order to drastically lower their demand Each 4 Watt LED Light reduces the electric load by 36 Watts (that is, a 40 watt bulb is replaced by a 4 watt LED). Only 105 Million such lights are required.

Therefore each household reduces power by 30 Led Lights x 36 Watts x 3.5 Million Households = 3.789 MW. Showing all the Zeros 30 x 36 x 3,500,000 = 3,780,000,000 Watts reduced. = 3.8 MW. Since there are 2 reactors per Nuke Plant, the Business/government sector will have to do their part and knock off their 3.9MW. Call it 4 MW when the air conditioning load is considered. Factor in all the savings by businesses and governmental load and air conditioning reductions and one can conclude that 4 of the Nuclear plants, 8 reactors, can be shut down and converted to safe, clean and green fuel fired boilers. The manufacture, advertising, selling and installation of 30 quality Led Lights in 3.3 Million Households at $50 dollars each comes out to be only $5.25 Billion to obtain $52.5 Billion Dollars of Reduced Energy Cost.

Nuclear Power Plants in North Carolina Net Generation and Capacity, 2005
Plant Name/ Total Reactors	Capacity Net MW(e)	Net Generation Million kwh	Share of State Nuclear Generation (percent)	Operator/Owner
Brunswick 2 reactors	1,838	14,536.748	36	Carolina Power & Light
McGuire 2 reactors	2,200	17,514.163	44	Duke Energy
Shearon Harris 1 reactor	900	7,930.828	20	Progress Energy
Total 5 reactors	4,938	39,981.739	100
Source: Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report," and Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report." *Sum does not equal exactly 100 due to independent rounding.

There are 5 licensed commercial nuclear reactors in North Carolina. Units 1 and 2 at the Brunswick plant are boiling water reactors (BWR). The pair of reactors at the McGuire power plant and the lone reactor at the Shearon-Harris plant are light water pressurized reactors (PWR).

Nuclear Power Plants in South Carolina Net Generation and Capacity, 2005
Plant Name/ Total Reactors	Capacity Net MW(e)	Net Generation Million kwh	Share of State Nuclear Generation (percent)	Operator/Owner
Catawba 2 reactors	2,258	19,275	36	Duke Power/various*
H.B. Robinson 1 reactor	710	5,770	11	Progress Energy/Progress Carolinas
Oconee 3 reactors	2,538	20,622	39	Duke Power/Duke Energy Corp.
V.C. Summer 1 reactor	966	7,469	14	South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. /Joint Ownership**
Total 7 reactors	6,472	53,136	100
Source: Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report," and Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report." Unit 1: North Carolina Electric Membership Corp. (56.3%), Duke Power (25%), and Saluda River Electric Coop., Inc. (18.8%); Unit 2: North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1 (75%) and Piedmont Municipal Power Agency (25%). *South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. (66.7%) and Santee Cooper (33.3%).

There are 7 licensed commercial light water pressurized reactors (PWRs) in South Carolina. The Oconee plant has the most nuclear capacity of any of the State's plants, with three light water reactors rated at 846 Megawatts (electric) each. The largest reactors, however, are the pair of PWRs at the Catawba plant, rated at 1,129 MW(e) each. The other two nuclear plants are single-unit operations.

Driving down the highway past Lake Norman, on 3 occasions, we never saw a boat out on the lake and the shores certainly are not full of picnic sites and vacation activities. No ducks or geese were noticed and there were no fish markets to be seen. Well, it is a small lake but one can wonder if it can stand the dumping of Tritiated Water from the 2 McGuire Reactors which have no cooling towers and the heat has to be going somewhere. I guess it seemed “Dead” to me because of my anti-nuclear outlook. r.j.g. 5/9/09

Charlotte N C , surrounded by 10 Atomic Reactors can use LED Lights to solve the problem

Pittsburgh, PA, March 31^st, 2009 Author, R. J. Gramm has discovered that there are 10 Nuclear Reactors that encircle Charlotte and Columbia in the Carolinas. He was doing research for this web site , about the subject of harm by Radio-Active Water on the DNA of people who drink such water. He found a map of where the Reactors are located in the South-East of the USA and was startled to find a total of 14 Reactors in the pair of states. They have to discharge Tritiated Water into the rivers and lakes in order to make Nuclear Power.

Anti-Nuclear web sites have been complaining for years about the release of Tritium into the atmospheres but never got any results. The Nuclear Power Industry is politically connected and well subsidized by the U S Government. The “CO2 Myth”, as Mr. Gramm considers it, has been the subject of his work for the last 5 years on his web site and when he found a wonderful Op-ED by James A. Peden

Mr. Gramm knew at once that his work as well as the Peden piece was surely enough to put to rest all the carbon credit and global warming stuff once and for all. But there was one loose end. How come nobody knows about all the TRITIATED WATER being released into essentially all of America’s drinking water? The EPA web site only mentions “Tritium” and says how safe it is to release over and over. But, there was a standard on the maximum radio-activity for Tritiated Water he found elsewhere and that raised his interest. He suspects everything that the government does.

Since Tritiated Water behaves like old fashioned pure water, can not be filtered out, and would become part of the bodies of people who drink the water, this was serious stuff. He added some Human Genome information to his web site and it was as horrible of a situation as all of the Radio-Active Solid Waste and other releases that nobody knows about. As chance would have it, he discovered that the little solid state electronic L.E.D.s (Light Emitting Diodes) were being promoted for Christmas trees by DOE (Department Of Energy) while the rest of the world is installing household bulbs at a great pace. Mr. Gramm is not a fan of DOE.

Only 2 weeks worth of study revealed that these efficient, cool, tiny, low power lights were being grouped together into super efficient light bulbs could really do wonders for the USA by reducing the national lighting needs by a whopping 300,000 Mega Watts out of the 1 million Mega Watts that we have in service. All the harm done by the piddling 100,000 Mega Watts of capacity that the horrible 104 Nuclear Reactors have were suddenly QUITE OBSOLETE and un-necessary. The truth is that the nuclear power types always say they supply 20% of America’s power. Not so. 100,000 Mega Watts is only 10% or less. They can’t seem to keep these old, dangerous antiques running smoothly.

So, therefore, trying to convince the U S Government, the NRC, DOE, The Supreme Court (who thinks CO2 is Pollution), both houses of Congress and a population that believes in global warming and reducing “carbon emissions” is a waste of time and energy. An old bird in Pittsburgh is NO MATCH for the Power of The Presidency that chairs the NRC and all the money that DOE gets to promote Nuclear Power and do all the bad projects that we do not want or need.

The SOLUTION TO SHUT DOWN the foolish and dangerous industry that hurts America at every turn is to install Led Lights all across America as quickly as possible on a high priority basis as though your life depended upon it. It turns out that your life may actually depend upon shutting those reactors. Mr. Gramm believes that time wounds all heels. Truth, Justice and the American Way is going to come down on the heads of the people who built the Global-Warming/Climate-Change/Climate-Crisis/CO2-Myth.

All Americans will benefit greatly if they buy a house full of Led Lights and install them. They will see the electric bill go down immediately and stay low for 10 or more years as a result. They will have more cash (a tax free income) and nobody can stop them. Good Luck America and God Bless.

The project to rescue Charlotte from the clutches of the Nukes is going to be more complicated than meets the eye. The problem is not so much about contacting all the people who use electric power and spend the time and money to describe what the heck a LED Light is because the average customer has only to do a web site search and more information is available on the nature of LED Lights is all there.

The Bush Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, signed on Dec 18^th , 2007 says to phase out 100 watt Bulbs in 2010 and finish phasing 40 watt incandescent bulbs starting in 2014. It sounds to this Author that 2010 is just around the corned and we need some 100 watt incandescent substitutes pretty quick. Bush signed thinking that the DOE recommended CFL’s were going to do the job as the Phase out began, did not know that LED Lights existed and did not know that the LEDs last 5 times (or More) longer that the CFLs. Home Depot and Lowes are LOADED with hundreds of the large and small funny, fragile and dangerous short lived CFLs. They are already obsolete and a hazard to dispose of. Many are a 100 Watt incandescent substitute. Because of the Bush push on the advice of DOE. Fines for not doing the CFL disposal according to law are on the horizon.

Tell your Home Depot and Lowes managers to return them and place some orders for LEDs. Pick a UL approved one with a dimmable light out-put one like the one in the following link as a substitute for the dead duck 100 watts soon to be Banned. It is only a 40 watt incandescent substitute, but will likely do the job because it is a better directed light situation and the old lumen standard was a fudged test and measurement script. The earth Led 40 watt dimmable bulb is shown below.

Dimmable means that it is spike and surge resistant because dimmers often add a (chopped) current method to do the dimming. One does not have to install it with a dimming switch and it will work fine (longer) in an ordinary off-on lamp socket. All the Home Depot stores should get the message about what to do and start setting up sources for the leds at places like LedLight.com and earthled.com. Our illustrious government has set up another CRISIS situation with the environmental loosing CFLs and according to my calendar 2010 in only 7 months away and the only folks who can respond to it are the Many LED Light suppliers which I have not had the time to study and recommend.

However, there are some that can be recommended such as the following 40 Watt substitute:

www.earthled.com rated#1 by greenhome.huddler.com CL-3 light bulb ( 3 watts )

LedLightAmerica is forced to conclude that earthled.com ( Advanced Lumonics, LLC ) Boca Raton Florida has demonstrated superior performance and strong leadership in a new and growing market.

™ - This author hopes that all the Home Depots and any other major chains in the Carolinas will welcome the EarthLed sales people to discuss what the good and practical items might be to order in the next few months and offer some store-paid-for-advertising to introduce the way the supply and demand situation can be handled. The idea of forcing Nuclear Utilities to change their ways is pie in the sky stuff.

We only have 7 months before all the bad publicity about the CFLs and the 100 Watt deadline gets media attention. GE, Quick Brite and Sylvania have taken the “Mercury Plunge” and it is regrettable.

This author has decided to get a distributorship with earthled.com because they are leading the pack of LED suppliers with UL labels that the DOE can not attack. Believe it on not, DOE is AGAINST widespread installation of led lights that will lower the National Lighting Load as well as lowering the Air-Conditioning load as well. Time wounds all heels and DOE must know that. It is obscene that Home Depot and Lowes have both swallowed DOE supported, environmental disaster that these Mercury contaminated losers represent. Now we have several thousand big stores with a large and costly obsolete inventory and some Mercury vapor in them as well. The vapor will be there for a long time.

Page 11 The struggle to ExonerateCO2 continues against DOE who want to Capture CO2 and drive the cost of COAL Fired Electricity UP by 10% so that Nuclear Power will be more attractive? --- What?

P.O. Box 1638
Alexandria, VA 22313
Tel: 1-877-358-6699
www.AmericasPower.org

Hello from ACCCE!

It's been a busy week, as we've been on the road attending the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) conference on carbon capture technology in Pittsburgh. We're glad to be back, and excited to tell you a little about the event.

Jared Ciferno, a technology manager at NETL, gave an overview of the status of the Department of Energy's R&D program. He said DOE's goal by 2020 is to have commercial deployment of post-combustion CO2 capture that:

· Captures 90 percent of CO2
· Has 99 percent storage permanence
· Has less than a 10 percent increase in the cost of electricity

Over the next few days, we heard from researchers about post-combustion control that included solvents, sorbents, oxy-combustion and membranes.

Click on the picture below to see Notre Dame Professor Edward Maginn talk about his research into ionic liquids (salts that are liquid at room temperature), a breakthrough absorption technology for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture.

It looks like that “Old Bird in Pittsburgh” is up against DOE at every turn. DOE has a Notre Dame Professor Edward Maginn and Jared Ciferno, a technology manager, with a good salary, working hard with a big budget at the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). NETL did NOTHING to advance the Led Light Technology so as to make drastic electric power reductions and would rather rail against the One And Only, Mother Natures Super Food Growing, Environmental Super Gas which knows how to store CO2 into edible food we all need. DOE WILL NEVER admit that WATER VAPOR is the Principal Green House Gas. Is the EPA going to insist on an Environmental Impact Study about where to store this new funny stuff?

It is a surprise that they came to Pittsburgh and did not visit Beaver Valley #1and #2, Nuclear Power Plants.

THAT is why the installation of a large volume of led lights in the Heart of the Area where a big Nuclear Power Infection Resides (Charlotte NC) is one of America’s most urgent projects.

Author R. J. Gramm has another project up his sleeve to drastically reduce Transformer Core Losses World Wide and there by make the planet a better place. Such a project will never be assisted by DOE as well. Go to www.3-windows.com for details and fund some transformer startups that can help future generations to survive. Some good salesmen, who sell the ideas to existing Transformer Manufacturers as a way to make a living, is another way to get some activity.

Getting back to the Charlotte Nuke reduction, we need some data on LOWES (who have 20 stores in Charlotte and 20 in Columbia) that should be convinced to handle Led Lights as well as Kmart/Sears. An important aspect of the 90% lighting load reduction that the LEDs provide is that the Electric Air Conditioning load will also go down and essentially double the benefit for the electric customers.

The whole energy/political/Nuclear-Power/Global-Warming ball of wax becomes clear as to why the CFLs were pushed by DOE so that when the electric energy tax is imposed it will be justified as a way to force the consumers to switch to CFLs as a way to reduce the impact of the tax. It is using the old “Cigarette Tax to reduce smoking” justification for the tax. It explains why there are so many CFLs in the West View PA Home Depot.

All this stuff is so negative because it is a “Long Crisis” atmosphere which always forces people to get on the “Band Wagon to Hell”. When one understands that DOE is “The Enemy Within” that is leading the “Orchestra of Lies and Denial” things get more clear. Time Does Wound All Heels and that time is near.

Go to www.progress-energy.com/aboutenergy/wnc.asp and note that their new plant (under construction) is NOT a nuclear plant and they may have data as to why they decided against Nuclear.

They are not infected with Nuclear Plants and they may be able to contribute greatly to America by showing how to convert the Nuclear that they have to conventional fuels after they realize what the promotion of led lighting can do for their Load Profile which will show both a lighting reduction as well as an air conditioning reduction as a result of the led light installations.

It is a worth while idea to print out the following file so that one can Understand Them:

They have a “Minor Nuclear Infection” that can be systematically arrested with proper guidance.

Starting with Led Lights and knowing how much load reduction will accompany the reductions from a customer base that installs Led Lights in place of the incandescent lights

Duke Energy “A classic Pro-Nuclear” who attacks Coal with “Carbon Credit” stuff! Go to:

http://duke-energy.com With Effort, one can find out about their Nukes and the newest one now in the engineering stage. Westinghouse must have really cut the price a lot.

This author finds it Obscene that such a plant is in the engineering stage when the citizens do not know about all the Tritiated Water (Because of NRC and DOE hidden agenda, and Duke “ignorance” of the releases even though they are reported from the other Nukes in the Carolinas.

NIRS.org (c’mon nirs, Spend some lawyer money) ought to put in a lawsuit on Tritiated Water Releases.

Also, the Carbon Offset Program and NC Green Power that extract cash from an ignorant public should be tested in court for “truth in advertising” and racketeering promotion of Ponzi schemes that gives the participant nothing back but the first $4.00 matching on the fist payment to each of the plans. The law suit should ask for all the money back and the court should be advised of all the Pro CO2 information that is available.

If there was ever a company that did not need another Nuclear Plant it is Duke. Aggressive LED Light sales and installation in the Carolina base will go a long way in convincing Duke to switch the engineering to a state of the art steam plant next to the old Nuke with enough capacity to run some steam lines over there as soon as all the Nuke Stuff cools down. Westinghouse can help. But They will hate it. It might even be cheaper than going for the investment needed for the reactor up-grade needed in the life extension plan for the old nuke. Both of these companys must stop dumping Tritiated Water into all of the drinking water sources.

The cost of the LED Lights is carried by the reduction in the power bill, followed by an 8 to 10 year period because of the long LED Life while the led light revolution considers how low the price of the LEDs can be made to go. The nice thing about reducing the power out put by Atomic Power Plants is that it reduces the horrible Radio Active Solid Waste that nobody knows what to do with. It reduces the Mutation-Causing, DNA-Harming, Tritiated Water Releases and stops the closed Nuclear Plants from telling us how they are the “clean and safe source of energy” over and over and over. A clean and safe nuclear plant is a Closed Nuclear Plant. But, the US government doesn’t know how to make them safe and get rid of the hazardous fuel that will be radioactive for millions of years. (See Item Q) below)

The LED LIGHT Manufacturers do not have to know about ANY of the Nuclear Plants. They only have to know about the good that they will do by doing a good job of helping their customers to save a ton of money. They can be admired and, hopefully, very profitable in the long haul. A solar electric system on the roof of your house (that does not have to support antique incandescent light bulbs) is one heck of a lot smaller and cheaper as a result of the wonderful folks that have risked the business of getting into The Led Light Revolution. One R.J.Gramm feels a lot better messing around with Led Lights than being an Anti Nuclear advocate.

The Anti-Nuclear types have lost the battle after 30 years of being beat up by the continuous production of lies, myths, mis-information and well funded by US economic support for distorted web sites that play their part in the grand scheme of promoting and approving everything the Pro-nukes say and do. But, the appearance of Led Light technology can be a real help for the Anti-Nuclear folks if they are smart enough to understand that Led Lighting is certain to spread far and wide and lower the demand for electricity. Most of the Anti-Nukes have gradually swung away from having one subject to sell and have advanced into generally being “Do Good” enterprisers with a lot of causes and “Donate Buttons”. It may well be that trying to sell Led Lights is “Below Them” because all the programs they now support are in a stable area of “Do-Goodingness” that can go on forever. There are a lot of things that must be done because there is a continuous supply of jerks who always do the wrong thing. In a big Country like America, a lot of Good and Harm can happen at the same time.

So, Therefore, The way to defeat the “Pro-Nuclear Power” advocates is to do things that make electric Power Generation and Distribution obsolete. It can be done with all kinds of positive activity that does not dwell on being an “Anti Activity” but rather being a promoter of Positive, “Pro Activity” on the following things:

A) Manufacturing and distributing Led Lights, residential first, then businesses then in the Beltway

B) Manufacturing and distributing Residential Solar Electric Systems, big or small

C) Promoting Locally Owned and Operated (Non-Nuclear) Power Plants that have back-up capacity.

D) Promoting and owning Local Clean Coal and by-product energy plants for local use.

E) Developing local “Energy Stations” that serve as the “Gas Station Alternative” for electric cars.

F) Place your advance order for a Chevrolet “VOLT” tomorrow, GM needs your help, but GM stock.

G) Double the building thermal insulation system for all structures with some retro-fit passive solar

H) Promote natural-gas fuel cells for neighborhood sized utilities, private funding and fuel back up

I) Install a residential dual fuel electric generator with a full 12 day un-interruptible electric backup.

J) Install a geo-thermal heating and air conditioning system with full back up electric supply.

K) Build only Passive Solar Heating in northern buildings with Solar Electric operated ventilation.

L) Make sure, in the meantime, that you can do without electric power for a 1 month period

M) Install a wood-pellet/coal stove with cooking features as a build on the side of the house for safety.

N) Get rid of all politicians every 6 or 8 years for sure with 1 year un-employment features

O) Buy stock in the “Nuclear Fleet” operating companies until ownership and control is guaranteed.

P) Convert your Nuclear Plants to fuel fired boilers and find work for 1000 slaves at each reactor.

Q) “Put Back” in small pieces all the nuclear waste in sturdy carbon pitch containers buried far and wide.

S) Study the death and disease statistics for the metropolitan Charlotte N C area over the last 40 years

T) De-construct the CO2 myth, the Carbon Credit scam and the Tritiated Water cover-up with penalties

U) Stop work on the Smart Grid, Carbon Sequestration, and a host of DOE programs & nuke laboratories

V) .Is this a work of art, or what? No, it is only some old guy in Pittsburgh switching to Led Lighting.

Because the lighting load for Led Lights is so low, it opens the door for additional benefits and advancements that are not usually considered. For example;

An UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) can be considered for keeping lights on during a power failure. And, of course, the light next to the computer must surely be a Led Light simply because it is likely to be a high use light. A typical small UPS can run a small Led Light for a very long time indeed.

Computers have also created a market for Surge Protectors which are readily available and it might be a good idea to install a few on lamps that are used a lot because Led Lights have the same vulnerability to surges as a computer or solid state TV. The electric supply is getting more cluttered with surges every year as the grid gets larger and more complicated.

A residential sized solar electric system is now more practical because it can be made smaller because of the low power consumption of Led Lights. A properly sized UPS, of course, should be part of a solar electric system simply because the sun shines only during the day.

There are 2 Solar Heating Patents (authored and used for 10 years) by Mr. Gramm that are available to the Public because the patents have expired. They are US 4,058,109 Solar Heating and Insulating Apparatus, Nov. 15th, 1977 and US 4,498,455 Glazing Material Feb 12^th, 1985 and details of installation, testing information by a government approved lab and a whole host of brochures and sales collateral costing well over $ 250,000.00 is available from Mr. Gramm rongramm@msn.com on 2 CD’s at a combined price of $ 100.00 with 3 week delivery. Over 140,000 square feet of collector in Eastern USA and One Solar Envelope Home constructed as a result of the Patents are described on the CDs.

The solar heating work was halted by President Regan who came down hard against the Carter “War on Energy” and killed the Carter Tax Credit to Home Owners who could get a $2,500.00 tax credit at just about the time that suppliers were geared up to really get stuff installed. When politics gets to work stopping Good things or promoting Bad things (Like Nuclear Power and Global Warming myths) it is not good for America.

There is also a failed attempt to get a Transformer Patent on www.USPTO-Broken.com which tells a story of the Patent Office behavior that killed a really good 3-Phase Transformer idea over a 4 year period. Use of the idea as a proprietary contract arrangement (protected by US Copyright Law for 50 years) is now available from Mr. Gramm for the non-returnable sum of $1,000.00 that will be credited toward the royalty payments which are determined in a one on one, case by case, arrangement with Mr Gramm. More details are on www.3-windows.com

The use of the transformer ideas can result in a world wide savings of $ 8 Billion Dollars per year in 24/7 core losses as the result of a 25% weight reduction of core material that results from the ideas. There are also loss reductions from using MetGlas® with the ideas. The USA is WAY BEHIND the rest of the world due to the inability of DOE to lead the way and support American Manufacturers to get involved in the technology.

Both sites are kept open as a public service by Mr. Gramm as a way to insure that the USPTO way of doing things is changed to put America back on the front burner of innovation again. As things now stand, they are simply the custodian of 7 ½ million dead and hidden patents, most of which were never used and which expired in a much too short time period. They use these old patents with the word “ANTICIPATED” as though the dead inventors are still alive to view today’s world and the needs of today’s world when studying new ideas that are killed by anticipated thought patterns that are surely unfair and wrong. On the 3-window patent fiasco, they are in the position of a felony perpetrator as someone who kept a $ 105.00 application fee and has not replied to the inventor on the matter and are subject to Racketeering laws as well.

This inventor has healed himself on both the Solar Heating loss and the USPTO fiasco and looks forward to see what happens to LED Lighting. It was really good to see EarthLed products on TLC (The Learning Channel) on Sunday Night, April 19^th, 2009.

Here are the e-mail addresses where I sent the Above Press release on 3/31/09 and 4/1/09:

In the meantime, all of the information was posted as the first group of pages on my web site www.exonerateco2.com

It has only been 3 weeks and the subject is so negative and heavy that the response is surely going to take some time to figure out exactly what to do with it. That's OK. Rome wasn't built in a day. The sender is unknown to the recipients. There was other news that deserved some activity. Contact with the federal government is certain to yield some interesting results and this author hopes that everybody on the lists become a group of people who communicate with every body on the list so that you all can come to a consensus about what can (and should) be done on the problem of all the Tritiated Water releases into all the drinking water and evaporated into the air in the neighborhoods.

So, therefore, here are a few questions that this Author would like to ask the recipients of the first release and the copied in follow-up folks as well:

4) Did you check out any of the information and what was the response from the persons that you contacted?

As an experienced enterpriser, I have added more people who live near Charlotte and also sent my web site address to Senator Richard Burr.

I asked him to look into this and give his response. Likewise I asked Governor Perdue and Rep. Butterfield to ask all the NC Reps to look into this.

As a believer in the idea that time wounds all heels, I am hoping to intimidate every one to do something about this so we can point the finger of all the folks inside the beltway who have let this situation to exist for so long.

I expect and intend to make this page part of my web site and any responses that you make will not be part of the page; Unless you say so.

This author knows that un- solicited e-mails are mostly treated as SPAM. That is the way one handles all incoming mail and it doesn’t take all that long to scan the spam list before deleting them all. Everyone so far placed on the e-mailing list for attempting to generate interest on the North Carolina Nuclear Infection where Charlotte is surrounded by 10 reactors that produce a long list of radio active solids, liquids and gases hade not yet responded. The liquids and the gases are “released” into the neighborhoods and the solids are accumulated on site and continue to emit liquids and gases that are continuously released because there is no way to stop the production or to capture them.

As a result of 50 years of denial that all this bad stuff is continuously produced and released, the various agencies on the basic mail list (built up over the years) are skilled recipients that can say “all incoming mail from that source were never read”. Your’s truly can accept that. This author has found over the years that sooner or later people will do the right thing.

So, therefore the list for North Carolina is increased to include many of the health and environmental related names that are on the 200 person list from exonerateco2.com as follows. For example CDC always sends an automatically generated response saying somebody will respond (but they never do) Further, the EPA folks must have never filtered up to Lisa Jackson the truth from Dr. Sidso at co2science, or the link to Mr. Peden and all my good Exonerateco2 facts:

It would seem that the Food and Drug folks would be interested in Radio-Active, Tritiated Water releases used in food preparation. And, the Health and Human Services people should care about the health effects of drinking Tritiated Water which is so wide spread that it can not be avoided. These new people that are spread far and wide across America, are being asked to assist the people in North Carolina in any way that they can by contacting their superiors and expressing fear on behalf of the Carolina people who do not know about Tritiated Water, The health effects of it and the many reactors inside the Carolinas releasing it into their drinking water.

Page 15 and 16 are being sent to the above people in an attempt to shine a light into the minds of as many people as possible, as soon as possible so that things can change as soon as possible starting on 4/24/09.

Please open and read page 16 and Page 17 and the rest of the story on www.exonerateco2.com

I am about 1/3 of the way to sending to all the newspapers in North Carolina and the rest of the towns in North Carolina will be contacted as time allows:

The issue being addressed involve the secret releases of Tritiated Water into the rivers and lakes of north Carolina (and the rest of America as well) but the Carolinas have a special place in history as being the place with the largest number of reactors like 10 of them surrounding Charlotte.

Very few people know about all the releases being made into our drinking water except the people at the reactors who do the releasing. The various agencies that control the information about this stuff are in denial and will continue to be that way because that is what they have always done. The following links will describe what Tritiated Water is and give the information about it that everybody deserves to know:

They are also on www.exonerateco2.com on page 8 of Radio-Active Free Water And Food placed on the exonerateco2.com web site:

So, the way to get to the truth about something that nobody in the government seems to not know anything about is to ask them if what is stated in the 2 links from animatedsoftware.com are true and factual. For example:

1) Is it true that Tritiated Water acts like normal pure water which our bodies accept except it emits beta radiation for a long time?

2) Is it true that this Radio Active water can not be filtered out and requires an expensive scintillation machine to detect it?

3) Is it true that the body can accept the Tritiated Water and make it a part of the normal tissue replacement that the body uses many times in it’s normal cycle of life?

4) Can the part of the body that has used this Tritiated Water suffer damage from the constant radiation it receiver from the Radio-Active water?

5) Can the DNA of a person be damaged by this Radio-Active component in the body?

6) Can the body suffer damage when the radio-active water being used as a critical part of the body decays to Helium gas and a free radical ?

7) Why hasn’t the various public agencies responsible for American health and safety stopped the distribution of this radio active water into essentially ALL of our drinking water?

8) Why are new reactors being approved for construction with the clear public knowledge?

9) Why are the old reactors getting license extensions while this issue of bad water is secret?

While working to increase the contacts for local newspapers in North Carolina starting with “The Gaston Gazette”, I was happy to receive a note from CDC as follows:

Thank you for your inquiry to CDC-INFO. In response to your request for information on tritiated water being used in North Carolina and around the United States, please see the following information.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SWDA) is the main Federal law that ensures the quality of Americans' drinking water. Under the SDWA, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):
* Sets standards for drinking water quality; and
* Oversees the states, localities, and water suppliers who use these standards.
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/sdwa/index.html
You may also want to contact your state health department with your concerns. Contact information for your state health department is:
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Phone: (919) 733-4534
Web: www.ncdhhs.gov
Links provided to non-Federal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. These links do not constitute an endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the Federal Government, and none should be inferred. The CDC is not responsible for the content of the individual organization web pages found at these links.
Thank you for contacting CDC-INFO Contact Center. Please do not hesitate to call 1-800-CDC-INFO, e-mail cdcinfo@cdc.gov or visit http://www.cdc.gov if you have any additional questions.
CDC-INFO is a service of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). This service is provided by Vangent, Inc. under contract to CDC and ATSDR. This Author is glad they left the door Open because I have a ton of Questions.

After looking at the 2 items that the EPA promotes about Tritium on page 18 and then quickly looking over the 2 essays from Russell (Ace) Hoffman on Page 17, the conclusion is that there is no newspaper in the USA that would ask for his permission and then publish them. Their size and complexity is surely justified considering the Power and level of intensity that the Pro-Nukes use to defend their denial. But surely, there are interested people out there who could get Russell’s permission to make a 500 word capsule and print it.

However, since many lives are at stake and we are all being attacked by Tritiated Water at higher and higher concentrations every day, the 2 essays of Russell deserve to be read by everybody and the best way to present the information is to show the links when in an electronic media situation and people can easily go there and study the essays and get ALL the facts so that our population is more informed than a cadre of the PHDs inside the beltway. Pro Nuclear Power folks have an answer for everything and a denial of anything.

The first essay says that the EPA standard of 20,000 pico Curies Per Liter of Water is entirely too high and a reasonable person would suggest a level of 70 pico Curies Per Liter of Water.

20,000 pico Curies means 740 Nuclear Breakdowns per second per liter and the shooting out of 740 Beta particles (electrons) and leaving behind 740 HO free radicals every second. The betas break molecular bonds and do all sorts of destruction too numerous to mention.

The second essay proves that the 6 KEV speedy electrons released are not “weak” by any means and the EPA uses the “WEAK’ description over and over again (a sure sign of denial) and never mentions the effects of the left-overs going around and stealing electrons from other molecules and causing harm. Tritiated Water is very harmful water in disguise as normal pure water. Since water is the basic constituent of life itself, as guided by our DNA, everything in your body is at risk by Tritiated Water and it can be anywhere in the body causing harm.

This stuff is so heavy for me it will be a pleasure to look up some more e-mail addresses for the local newspapers in North Carolina which will be tacked on to the bottom of the complete list. All of the web sites are very finely done and the content is mostly favorable and happy to read.:

I am happy to note that my request to the EPA ‘s Safe Drinking Water Hotline to answer the first 9 questions has been acknowledged and they are working upon looking into it..

This was good news and is far more reaching than the EPA realizes because it opens the door to a highly transparent communication system where EVERYBODY knows what I am doing and they can wait for the results without having to go to the EPA.

However, all are encouraged to send Russell’s 2 links to friends in the medical community and find out what people think about this.

Next we have to wait on a response about the 9 questions asked of the EPA. They have no idea that their response will be sent to most of the newspapers in North Carolina:

The first 19 pages are now posted on www.exonerateco2.com and I hope U ALL will visit the site and see the Ax I have to grind. I hope to get the time to open the remaining (below) local North Carolina web sites and add their e-mail addresses to this list before I post it on the co2 web site. As a result of opening the entire list of the N C web sites I am convinced that it is worth my time to attempt to save your lives with the knowledge about the horrors of Tritiated Water that I am publicizing. You folks down there are on the up and up and there seems to be not much bad news in your news papers. Ronald

Response (Safe Drinking Water Hotline - CJB) - 05/01/2009 11:27 AM
Thank you for your patients. Below you will answers to your questions.

1) Is it true that Tritiated Water acts like normal pure water which our bodies accept except it emits beta radiation for a long time?
Answer: Yes this is true, it acts chemically like "normal "water. Its natural decay rate gives it a half life of 12.3 years. Half life is However the natural turnover of water in the body results in a biological half life of 2-10 days depending on water intake which replaces it.
2) Is it true that this Radio Active water can not be filtered out and requires an expensive scintillation machine to detect it?
Answer: Filtration can be accomplished but is highly specialized and expensive, not on a scale available for public water systems. Liquid scintillation counting is used to determine the quantity of tritium present in water.
3) Is it true that the body can accept the Tritiated Water and make it a part of the normal tissue replacement that the body uses many times in it’s normal cycle of life?
Answer: Yes. Water is distributed throughout the body in about 2 hours including any tritiated water.
4) Can the part of the body that has used this Tritiated Water suffer damage from the constant radiation it receiver from the Radio-Active water?
Answers: Yes, there is a small risk of damage. Radioactivity carries some risk of cancer dependent on its dose and the organ affected. No one single organ is affected by water, the dose will be spread out over the body. Keep in mind you will receive 19-30 milli rems of dose from the naturally occurring radioactive potassium-40 in your body (orange juice, bananas) versus 0.3 mrem from tritium. The allowable dose from drinking water is 4 mrem or 20,000 picoCuries or a 3.6X10-5 (3-4 in 20,000) risk of cancer over lifetime. Radon (especially) and medical tests contribute far more risk to you relative to tritium.
5) Can the DNA of a person be damaged by this Radio-Active component in the body?
Answer: Yes. Radioactivity contributes to the risk of cancer via this mechanism. Beta radiation from tritium is weak.
6) Can the body suffer damage when the radio-active water being used as a critical part of the body decays to Helium gas and a free radical ?
Answer: Not really. This happens slowly, and the helium is a gas and will dissipate.
7) Why hasn't the various public agencies responsible for American health and safety stopped the distribution of this radio active water into essentially ALL of our drinking water?
Answer: None is 'distributed' on purpose. Some leaks from nuclear reactors or is present from natural sources or from previous atmospheric nuclear testing in the 50's and 60's. There is no such thing as risk free food or water.
8) Why are new reactors being approved for construction with the clear public knowledge?
Answer: Newer reactors are more modern designs and newer materials than the older units and will replace the electric generation lost as old plants go off line. NRC encourages public participation in its rulemaking and reactor approval process.
9) Why are the old reactors getting license extensions while this issue of bad water is secret?
Answer: Tritium is no secret. Please see the following sites for more information about tracking releases.
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html and http://www.reirs.com/effluent/.
EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline answers questions about the regulations and programs developed in response to the Safe Drinking Water Act. The Safe Drinking Water Hotline provides information, including access to publications, on EPA's drinking water standards, source water protection, and underground injection wells. The Hotline also provides referrals to state public water supply supervision programs, state underground injection control programs, and state laboratory certification programs.
(800) 426-4791 -- Toll Free
(703) 412-3330 -- International calls

Response (Safe Drinking Water Hotline - CJB) - 05/01/2009 11:27 AM
Thank you for your patients. Below you will answers to your questions.

1) Is it true that Tritiated Water acts like normal pure water which our bodies accept except it emits beta radiation for a long time?
Answer: Yes this is true, it acts chemically like "normal "water. Its natural decay rate gives it a half life of 12.3 years. Half life is However the natural turnover of water in the body results in a biological half life of 2-10 days depending on water intake which replaces it. ( your so-called biological half life doesn’t hold water. SIC. ) The body continuously replaces soft tissue and water is used to build the tissue and/or to store energy in the Liver or in storage as fat. So five minutes after one takes a drink, SOME OF The Tritiated Water is going to be part of you for a long time and is radiating SOME part of your body the very first day. Since the contamination of the water is a constant level of contamination situation, it doesn’t matter because the water that replaces it is also contaminated. This is bad news. )
2) Is it true that this Radio Active water can not be filtered out and requires an expensive scintillation machine to detect it?
Answer: Filtration can be accomplished but is highly specialized and expensive, not on a scale available for public water systems. ( This is more Bad News. ) Liquid scintillation counting is used to determine the quantity of tritium present in water.
3) Is it true that the body can accept the Tritiated Water and make it a part of the normal tissue replacement that the body uses many times in it’s normal cycle of life?
Answer: Yes. Water is distributed throughout the body in about 2 hours including any tritiated water. ( This is the same Bad News as in Answer1). )
4) Can the part of the body that has used this Tritiated Water suffer damage from the constant radiation it receiver from the Radio-Active water?
Answers: Yes, there is a small risk of damage. Radioactivity carries some risk of cancer dependent on its dose and the organ affected. No one single organ is affected by water, the dose will be spread out over the body. ( This is more bad news. Using the words “Small Risk” is unfair because small is a relative term (smaller than what) and taking a risk on something as necessary to life drinking water is obscene. ) Keep in mind you will receive 19-30 milli rems of dose from the naturally occurring radioactive potassium-40 in your body (orange juice, bananas) versus 0.3 mrem from tritium. ( There is nothing I can do about K-40 and people have been exposed to it for millions of years. You have not mentioned what kind of radiation it is and what it’s half life it has, but it doesn’t matter because it is a standard Pro-Nuke answer that typifies the denial of the harm. ) The allowable dose from drinking water is 4 mrem or 20,000 picoCuries or a 3.6X10-5 (3-4 in 20,000) risk of cancer over lifetime. ( The 20,000 pico Curies per second per liter is a Terribly High risk level that produces 740 Nuclear Decays per second for each liter of water involved. The 4 mrem way of thinking is old Hiroshima atomic bomb thinking. Somebody has prostituted you with the old Pro-nuke trickery. You can find out what happened to get the 20,000 number by visiting Russell Hoffman’s essay at http://www.animatedsoftware.com/environment/tritium/2006/EPATritiumStandard.htm ) Radon (especially) and medical tests contribute far more risk to you relative to tritium.( Recently my life was saved by the discovery of a Sub-Dural Hematoma which was repaired and I was happy to have taken the risk of the radiation to find the problem. My house is Radon free.)
5) Can the DNA of a person be damaged by this Radio-Active component in the body?
Answer: Yes. Radioactivity contributes to the risk of cancer via this mechanism. ( THIS IS BAD NEWS, FAR MORE THAN YOU REALIZE.) Beta radiation from tritium is weak. ( You should read Russell’s second essay about this “weak” stuff. Go to http://www.animatedsoftware.com/environment/tritium/2007/ItsAllAboutTheDNA.htm ).
6) Can the body suffer damage when the radio-active water being used as a critical part of the body decays to Helium gas and a free radical ?
Answer: Not really. This happens slowly, and the helium is a gas and will dissipate. ( Nothing Happens slowly in the Nuclear Game. The Beta is moving at 1/3 the Velocity of Light And the left over HO is right next to some body part. Forget the “Not really”)

7) Why hasn't the various public agencies responsible for American health and safety stopped the distribution of this radio active water into essentially ALL of our drinking water?
Answer: None is 'distributed' on purpose. ( So now the response has degenerated into an out-right Lie. ALL OF THE RELEASES are known by everybody but this responder and the General Public. It is distributed because the reactors are distributed across America and all of them dump the Tritiated Water into the nearby rivers or other bodies of water. Fresh pure water is used to dilute the contamination to the ridiculously high EPA Standard. In some places the bad water is mixed with water contaminated up-stream (Like water in the Mississippi River which ends up at New Orleans with almost 3% Tritiated Water at low winter flow.) Some leaks from nuclear reactors or is present from natural sources or from previous atmospheric nuclear testing in the 50's and 60's. (Leaks are Very common but nobody is out there trying to find out how bad it is without court action.) There is no such thing as risk free food or water. ( Now, somebody is playing games and everybody is being urged to go to www.exonerateco2.com and read my Radio-Active-Free Water And Food section.)
8) Why are new reactors being approved for construction with the clear public knowledge?
Answer: Newer reactors are more modern designs and newer materials than the older units and will replace the electric generation lost as old plants go off line. ( The Pro Nukes will never go off line with an old plant. They will continue to get license extensions and replace what they have to with an endless use of Public money to do it as is now being done with most of the 40 year old dangerous, brittle existing losers. ) NRC encourages public participation in its rulemaking and reactor approval process. ( You got to be kidding. )

9) Why are the old reactors getting license extensions while this issue of bad water is secret?
Answer: Tritium is no secret. ( Tritiater Water Releases are a Secret as far as the Public is concerned. I just proved it when you mention only 2 “Tritium” results out of 444 responses to questions and NO RESULTS for “Tritiated Water” which is the bone of contention. People who would go to a hearing on a new plant are Innocent Citizens that are always dismissed as un-important or ill informed.) Please see the following sites for more information about tracking releases.
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html ( thanks for the link, but my subject is about all of the releases into the Rivers and lakes (as well as forced evaporation of Tritiated Water from the so called “Cooling Towers”. ) and http://www.reirs.com/effluent/. ( Thanks again but I have studied this site carefully and all the releases from Beaver Valley 1 & 2 are posted on my exonerateco2.com site as well as for ALL operating reactors.)
EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline answers questions about the regulations and programs developed in response to the Safe Drinking Water Act. The Safe Drinking Water Hotline provides information, including access to publications, on EPA's drinking water standards, source water protection, and underground injection wells. The Hotline also provides referrals to state public water supply supervision programs, state underground injection control programs, and state laboratory certification programs.
(800) 426-4791 -- Toll Free
(703) 412-3330 -- International calls
The important thing for you to realize, including this reply and from this point on, is that everything you say will be shown to essentially ALL of the print media in North Carolina as well as to the governors office , legislators and selected EPA readers of mine built up over the years as I learned about this for the exonerateco2 site which is a temporary place to show it as in the 1^st 19 Pages now put there.

I have difficulty responding to a nameless faceless and unknown person at your web site who has limited knowledge and authority to speak for the EPA. And I know of Lisa Jackson who has become an expert in only 3 months on the job on “CO2 Pollution” which states that the subject is “compelling and overwhelming” as the cause of Global Warming when there is none. A look at the NASA web site will tell her that WATER VAPOR is the Principal Green House Gas and is important to the survival of all life on the planet to keep us warn against the cold vacuum of outer space.

Soon, she will appear next to Rev Gore in the attached link from the Peden OP ED. She has embarrassed the people who submitted an 800 page report on Co2 from the people at www.co2science.org It may do her some good to read my effort at exonerateco2.com . which is currently being up dated so as to make it easier to read.

It was a big job to open all the web sites for the North Carolina Local Newspapers but it was a worthwhile effort because this author learned a lot about the state and the good behavior of the citizens. Here is the final group running alphabetically from Rocky Mount to Zebulon:

So, the local newspapers that were found that did not insist on my filling out a form have all been contacted and this group is the last of them.

I hope that everybody on this page will get involved in this and study the previous information as posted on the exonerateco2.com web site and publish any or all of my information. I am waiving my copyright notices on the entire effort so that as much information can be spread as far and wide as possible.

The next part of the project will be to find out what people think about this and figuring out exactly what to do to get the administrators and legislators to do something about this entire subject which is a terrible story of lies, deceit and cover ups that are not good for America or the world.

Sent Page 16 North Carolina follow up with following EPA , FDA and HHS names : 34 addresses

4/25/09 Sent Page 17 with the following local Newspaper folks listed : 29 addresses

4/30/09 Page 19 with 23 new names to look up as well as the last 26 local newspaper folks as soon as the response on Page 18 from the EPA is cast in Bronze along with the required response from yours truly. The EPA response is obviously a classic denial which will be easy to destroy with truth and honesty that is not usually possible when this kind of stuff is presented by skilled Pro Nuclear respondents.

The assistance of the 2 Hoffman essays as presented earlier will certainly be helpful for sure.

National Energy Savings